CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1204DEC003752224
4 décembre 2025
The applicants’ complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention concerning the excessive length of civil proceedings were communicated to the Slovak Government (“the Government”).
Page 10 sur 33826
soc
613722cfcd58014677401c2e
27 février 1997
licenciée le 19 juin 1991; qu'elle a saisi la juridiction prud'homale de diverses demandes, dont l'une portait sur l'application de la rémunération minimale forfaitaire prévue par les articles 5 et 5-1
7ème et 2ème sous-sections réunies
CETAT:CETATEXT000020868751
11 mai 2009
del'Hôtel d'Assézat, de 40 644,27 euros correspondant à la convention conclue en 1994 pour les travaux relatifs au théâtre de la rue Labédat et de 140 682,37 euros pour la convention conclue la même année
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-248428
9 janvier 2026
The applicant complains under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention that the Constitutional Court’s refusal to award her the costs of her legal representation had a deterrent effect on the exercise of her right
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;FRA;FRE
V, Brusc/Belgique
ECLI:CEDH:001-250086
17 avril 2026
Invoquant l’article 6 § 1 de la Convention, les requérants se plaignent de la durée excessive des procédures.
ECLI:CEDH:001-249681
18 mars 2026
The applicant relies on Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention. QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention?
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-248459
10 décembre 2025
regard to the final judgment transmitted by the Court to the Committee in this case and to the violation established; Recalling the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1,
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1106DEC006054719
6 novembre 2025
The applicants’ complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention concerning the excessive length of civil proceedings were communicated to the Serbian Government (“the Government”).
ECLI:CEDH:001-183136
2 mai 2018
Having regard to the final judgment transmitted by the Court to the Committee in this case and to the violation established; Recalling the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1,
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0430JUD007278311
30 avril 2026
In the instant case, the violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention was based on a finding that the respondent State had not complied with its positive obligations to protect
ECLI:CEDH:001-250548
13 mai 2026
In addition, invoking Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, the applicant in application no.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1120DEC004279922
20 novembre 2025
The applicants’ complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No.
ECLI:CEDH:001-182364
4 avril 2018
final judgment transmitted by the Court to the Committee in this case and to the violation established; Recalling the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention
ECLI:CEDH:001-249353
25 février 2026
The applicant complains under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No.
6137229fcd580146773ff3a6
28 mars 1996
payés afférents, de prorata de 13e mois, de dommages-intérêts pour non versement de la participation à la formation professionnelle continue et de dommages-intérêts pour non-respect de l'article 5-2-1
ECLI:CEDH:001-250561
It raises issues of access to court under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and of interference with the applicant’s private life and lack of remedies in that respect under Articles 8 and 13 of the Convention
11ème chambre
DTA_2210481_20230418
18 avril 2023
En cinquième lieu, aux termes de l'article 8 de la convention européenne de sauvegarde des droits de l'homme et des libertés fondamentales : " 1.
9ème Chambre
DCA_24PA04826_20260320
20 mars 2026
Considérant ce qui suit : 1. M.
613724f8cd58014677419e48
10 octobre 2007
Y..., le 1er décembre 1994, en qualité de maçon niveau II, position 1 de la convention collective départementale du bâtiment et des travaux publics, a été licencié par courrier du 8 août 2002 au motif
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0312DEC001294825
12 mars 2026
The applicant company’s complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention concerning the excessive length of civil proceedings were communicated to the Croatian Government (“the Government”).