Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.

QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.     Has the applicant exhausted domestic remedies concerning his length of proceedings complaint given the enactment of Law no. 60 of 2025?   2.

THIRD SECTION Application no. 49458/20 Anar MALIKOV against Azerbaijan lodged on 17 October 2020 communicated on 8 December 2025 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The applicant is a member of an opposition party

QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES Did the applicant’s stay under 24-hour house arrest from 31 January to 12   March 2020 amount to deprivation of liberty?

Where deemed appropriate, the Board may summon and hear the parties concerned. 7.

QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.     Since the Court is the master of the characterisation to be given in law to the facts of the case (see Radomilja and Others v. Croatia [GC], nos.

Valiyev) were active members and functionaries of one of the major opposition parties, the Popular Front Party of Azerbaijan ( Azərbaycan Xalq Cəbhəsi Partiyası – “the PFPA”). Applicants Mr A.

QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.     Bearing again in mind that the Court is the master of the characterisation to be given in law to the facts of the case (see Radomilja and Others v.

        QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.

    QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has the applicant been subjected to inhuman or degrading treatment, in breach of Article   3 of the Convention?

Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.

  QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.     Was there a violation of Article 8 of the Convention on account of the applicant’s dismissal from office (see, for applicable principles, Xhoxhaj v.

QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been an interference with the applicant’s right to respect for his private and family life, within the meaning of Article 8 § 1 of the Convention, on account of the impugned

QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.     Has there been an interference with the applicant’s peaceful enjoyment of possessions, within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol No.   1?

      QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.     Is the applicant currently under a threat of deportation to Iran?

      QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been an interference with the applicant’ s right to respect for his private and/or family life, within the meaning of Article   8 §   1

    QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of Article 3, alone or in conjunction with Article   14 and/or Article 1 of Protocol No. 12 thereof, on account of the alleged ineffective

    QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of Article 8 of the Convention on account of the applicant’s dismissal from judicial office   (see Xhoxhaj v. Albania , no.

the Rules of Court); the decision to indicate an interim measure to the respondent Government under Rule 39 of the Rules of Court and the fact that this interim measure has been complied with; the parties