denial of access to legal advice during the first 48 hours of detention (24 hours in the Averill case), in combination with the provisions in national law whereby the choice of the accused to remain silent

The court found that the self-incriminating declarations could not be admitted as evidence in trial as the applicant had not been notified of his right to a lawyer and his right to remain silent, although

on 26 April 2012 the investigator tried to question the applicant, who refused to make any statement in respect of the events of 17   April 2012, relying on his constitutional right to remain silent

suivants : * joystick à remplacer, * faisceau électrique principal, * batterie, * coupe batterie, * vase expansion, * alternateur, * électricité au tableau de bord, * pression huile moteur, * silents

His mobile phone had thereafter been silent for the following 15 hours, which was very unusual for him.

/2008 62155/00 PROVIDE S.R.L. 05/07/2007 05/10/2007 39933/03 BUONFARDIECI 18/12/2007 18/03/2008 41062/05 CAPRIATI 26/07/2011 26/07/2011 20193/03+ PISCITELLI ET AUTRES 12/10/2010 12/01/2011 36624/02 SILVERI

The applicants were heard under caution and enjoyed the right to remain silent and neither applicant ever admitted torture, or any other crimes, either during the asylum proceedings or during the criminal

In November 2009 the Court of Cassation nonetheless dismissed the appeal, in a judgment which remained silent as to the legislative reform.

Under relevant domestic law, persons heard as a witness by such a parliamentary enquiry procedure do not have the right to remain silent, unless they are bound by a professional obligation of secrecy (

N. was called to give evidence at the applicant’s trial as a “person accused in connected proceedings” but chose to remain silent as he was entitled to do under Italian law.

According to the questioning form dated 14 November 2003 which explained an arrested person’s rights, the applicant was reminded of her right to remain silent and was informed that she could request the

pièces de la procédure viciée ou doit s'étendre à tout ou partie de la procédure ultérieure ; " qu'en l'espèce et en tout état de cause, la validité du procès-verbal établi le 11 juillet à 23 h 35 par Silvère

SIGNE électroniquement par Silvère PLATRET juge en ayant délibéré, et le greffier – mention des noms et prénoms des signataires au pied du dispositif de la décision.

INTIMÉE DÉFENDEURS À L'INCIDENT : Monsieur [W] [T] né le 02 décembre 1981 à [Localité 8] (TUNISIE) de nationalité tunisienne [Adresse 1] [Localité 6] représenté par Me Arnaud Silvère

B A, représenté par Me Siffert, demande au tribunal : 1°) d'annuler, pour excès de pouvoir, l'arrêté du 17 août 2023 en tant que le préfet de la Seine-Maritime a rejeté sa demande de titre de séjour

Ont été entendus au cours de l'audience publique : - le rapport de Mme Favre, - et les observations de Me Siffert, substituant Me Guerard, représentant M. A.

B A, représenté par Me Siffert, demande au juge des référés, saisi sur le fondement de l'article L. 521-3 du code de justice administrative : 1°) d'enjoindre au préfet de la Seine-Saint-Denis de lui

inapplicable to the proceedings imposing the fine; by ten votes to two, that there had been a violation of Article 10 (art. 10) of the Convention as regards the refusal to allow the applicant to remain silent