He also contended that the forfeiture was contrary to Article 12(2) of the Constitution, which guarantees the right not to be tried or punished twice.

Having regard to the considerations under 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 it has not been established that a forcible return of the applicant to Turkey is contrary to Article 3 of the Convention.”

  Nevertheless, it was the same municipality which two and a half years later sought to invalidate the sale-purchase as contrary to the law.

    Was the non-enforcement of the judgment in the applicant’s favour in the present case contrary to Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article   1 of Protocol No. 1 thereto?

QUESTION tO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his family life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention, through the authorities’ decision to deprive the applicant

    Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his family life, contrary to Article   8 of the Convention (see X v.

  QUESTION tO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for family life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention?

  QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to freedom of peaceful assembly, contrary to Article 11 of the Convention (cf. Patyi and Others v.

    QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to freedom of peaceful assembly, contrary to Article 11 of the Convention (cf. Patyi and Others v.

QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to freedom of expression contrary to Article 10 of the Convention, taking into account, in particular, the specific circumstances

  QUESTION tO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to freedom of expression, in particular his right to impart information and ideas contrary to Article 10 of the Convention

    Has the applicant suffered discrimination in the enjoyment of his Convention rights on the grounds of the disability of his child, contrary to Article 14 of the Convention read in conjunction

QUESTIONs tO THE PARTIES Was the applicant’s right of access to the Supreme Court violated contrary to Article 6 § 1 of the Convention.

    Were the applicant’s rights under Article 8 of the Convention restricted for the purposes other than those prescribed in it, contrary to Article 18 of the Convention?

QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Having regard to the cumulative effect of the “dangerous detainee” regime, imposed on the applicant from 13 September 2022 until 7 June 2023, has he been subjected to treatment contrary

QUESTION tO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his private and family life contrary to Article   8 of the Convention?

In particular, was the applicant’s trial in absentia contrary to that provision (see Sejdovic v. Italy [GC], no. 56581/00, § 82, ECHR 2006 ‑ II)?

QUESTION Has the applicant suffered discrimination in the enjoyment of her/his Convention rights on the ground of her/his status as a remand prisoner, pending trial, contrary to Article 14 of the Convention

In view of all the circumstances, has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for her private life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention?