8 of the Convention and with his freedom of movement, contrary to Article 2 of Protocol No. 4 to the Convention.

The applicant and the State Attorney’s Office objected arguing that the divorce judgment had been contrary to Croatian family law at the time.

to Article 5 (art. 5) of the Convention, her right to manifest her pacifist beliefs contrary to Article 9 (art. 9), her right to freedom of expression contrary to Article 10 (art. 10), and that the 1934

    In the light of the guarantees issued by the Russian Federation and having regard to the risk which the applicants allege to face, would their extradition be contrary to their rights under

    Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to freedom of expression, contrary to Article   10 of the Convention?

to Article 14 read in conjunction with Articles 3, 8 and   11 of the Convention and contrary to Article 1 of Protocol No. 12 to the Convention.

    Has the first applicant suffered discrimination on the ground of “other status”, contrary to Article 14 of the Convention read in conjunction with Article 8 § 1 of the Convention?

Such advertising was considered to have been unethical, and contrary to public morals.

to section 69 of the Army Act 1955 and with one count of disobeying a lawful command contrary to section 34 of that Act.

SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the Serbian authorities’ refusal to allow a change of the forname and surname chosen by the applicant (“Hudž   Lavizob”), finding it to be contrary

Lacaïle ; - les observations de Me Conerardy, représentant la commune d'Angoulême. Considérant ce qui suit : 1.

The applicant had sent to that lawyer an extrajudicial document to which he had referred to her behaviour as “unprofessional and contrary to the ethics” (“αντιεπαγγελματική και αντιδεοντολογική”) and had

QUESTION tO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to freedom of expression, contrary to Article 10 of the Convention, or his right to freedom of assembly, contrary to Article

If so, has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his private and family life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention?   2.

However, on 23 June 2025, the first-instance judgment was confirmed by the Constitutional Court, the latter noting that the European Convention on Human Rights was not directly applicable, contrary to

QUESTION tO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicants’ right to freedom of expression, contrary to Article 10 of the Convention, or their right to freedom of assembly, contrary to Article

QUESTION tO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to freedom of expression, contrary to Article 10 of the Convention, or his right to freedom of assembly, contrary to Article

QUESTION tO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to freedom of expression, contrary to Article 10 of the Convention, or his right to freedom of assembly, contrary to Article