On an unspecified date the applicant lodged a claim against the Committee with the Sabail District Court, asking the court to order the return of the unlawfully seized religious literature.

On 3 August 2010 the applicant brought a civil claim before the Sabail District Court against the “Irali” asking for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage caused to him as a result of the unauthorised reproduction

and the Sabail District Police Office as defendants and the Ministry of Emergency Situations as a third party.

On 30 December 2014 the Baku Court of Appeal upheld the Sabail District Court’s decision of 26 December 2014.

AU NOM DU PEUPLE FRANCAIS LA COUR DE CASSATION, PREMIERE CHAMBRE CIVILE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Sur le pourvoi formé par la société Panrico, société anonyme, dont le siège est Carretera Sabadell-Mollet

On 23   May 2006 the Sabayil District Court upheld the applicant’s request and ordered the Ministry to pay the applicant the correct amount of salary.

    Relying on a request from the Sabail District Prosecutor for an extension of the period of the applicant’s detention, on 11 January 2011 the Sabail District Court extended the applicant’s

text-indent:14.2pt } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic }   Communiquée le 7 février 2018   QUATRIÈME SECTION Requête n o 63384/13 Sabinel

dans un litige opposant : Monsieur Jean-Luc Y... ... 75116 PARIS non comparant Madame Nathalie Y... ... 75116 PARIS non comparante SAS PLACEMENTS IMMOBILIERS FRANCE GROUPE BANCO BEN SABADELL

Après avoir entendu, au cours de l'audience publique : - le rapport de Mme Reniez, - les conclusions de Mme Allais, rapporteure publique, - et les observations de Me Sabaniel pour l'Institut Mines-Telecom

    On 10 July 2009 the Sabail district prosecutor’s office quashed the decision of 26 June 2009 and re-opened the criminal inquiry. 12.

By a judgment of 18 January 2006, the Sabail District Court rejected the applicant’s claim against the Central Clinical Hospital.

On 15 July 2013 the applicants were brought before the Sabail District Court. The administrative case against each applicant was examined in the separate proceedings.

On 17 March 2011 the Sabail District Court refused to admit the claim finding that the applicant’s lawyer had failed to join his power of attorney to the application.

  Ils furent cités en date du 22 septembre 1992, pour la tenue d'une audience devant le juge pénal de Sabadell.   La partie accusatrice ne comparut pas.

La société Banco de Sabadell a formé un pourvoi incident contre le même arrêt. Le dossier a été communiqué au procureur général. Sur le rapport de M.

    While the applicant was serving her ten-day sentence, her lawyer filed an appeal against the Sabail District Court’s decision of 24 April 2002.

On 29 July 2011 the applicant lodged a criminal complaint with the Sabail District Court against the failure of Sabail district police office to investigate his case.