Sur le rapport de Mme Lanoue, conseillère référendaire, les observations de la SARL Matuchansky, Poupot, Valdelièvre et Rameix, avocat de la société Amazon France logistique, de la SCP Waquet, Farge, Hazan

        The employer appealed against the above decision of the Labour Court.

    On 11 October 2012 the applicant informed the labour court that he had reached an agreement with the company. On 22 October 2012 the labour court endorsed the agreement.

    No one shall be required to perform forced or compulsory labour. 3.

Nevertheless, the work performed was not to be considered as forced or compulsory labour.

SUR LE MOYEN UNIQUE : VU L'ARTICLE 809 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE CIVILE, ET L'ARTICLE L 122-14-4 DU CODE DU TRAVAIL; ATTENDU QUE DUCAMIN, DECLAUD, LE ROCH ET LASSUS-DEBAT, SALARIES DE LA SOCIETE ETABLISSEMENTS

    On 14 March 2000 IPA appealed to the Higher Labour and Social Court.

    On 27 August 2004 the Ljubljana Higher Labour and Social Court delivered a judgment.

On 6 July 2010 the Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs lodged an appeal on points of law against this judgment. By its decision of 27 October 2010 the Court of Cassation took over the case.

    The labour dispute 10.

The lex specialis in question is also section 133(1) and (2) of the Labour Act.” 14.

    After two hearings, on 9 December 2002 the Koper Labour Court dismissed the applicant’s claim. Both parties appealed. 9.

Violation of labour laws, labour safety and hygiene regulations “Violation of labour laws, labour safety and hygiene regulations attracts a fine on the employer from one hundred and forty four to up to

Laso, vice-président, pour statuer sur les demandes de référés. Les parties ont été régulièrement averties du jour de l'audience.

Germany - 25101/05 Decision 3.7.2007 [Section V] Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 Deprivation of property Extinguishment of civil claims in respect of forced labour under

Finally, the case lodged by the applicant against his employer for non ‑ pecuniary damage is still pending before the Istanbul 7th Labour Court.

Saint Denis de la Réunion DÉBATS : En application des dispositions de l'article 945-1 du code de procédure civile, l'affaire a été débattue le 28 Juin 2022 en audience publique, devant Alain Lacour

Clôture : 2 mai 2022 DÉBATS : En application des dispositions des articles 805 et 905 du code de procédure civile, l'affaire a été débattue le 28 Juin 2022 en audience publique, devant Alain Lacour