This part of the applications has been struck out of the Court’s list of cases or declared inadmissible by the Court, sitting in a single-judge formation, assisted by a rapporteur as provided for in Article

This part of the applications has been struck out of the Court’s list of cases or declared inadmissible by the Court, sitting in a single-judge formation, assisted by a rapporteur as provided for in Article

This part of the applications has been struck out of the Court’s list of cases or declared inadmissible by the Court, sitting in a single-judge formation, assisted by a rapporteur as provided for in Article

This part of the application has been struck out of the Court’s list of cases or declared inadmissible by the Court, sitting in a single-judge formation, assisted by a rapporteur as provided for in Article

This part of the applications has been struck out of the Court’s list of cases or declared inadmissible by the Court, sitting in a single-judge formation, assisted by a rapporteur as provided for in Article

Il se fonda sur les articles 13 et 24 § 2 de la Constitution ainsi que sur sa propre jurisprudence en la matière (paragraphes 15-17 cidessous). 12.

de la Convention Internationale des droits de l’enfant et l’article 24§2 et 3 de la Charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne; . la décision de réadmission est entachée d’un vice d’incompétence

le préambule de la Constitution, les article 3-1, 9-1 et 16 de la convention internationale des droits de l'enfant, ainsi que l'article 24-2 de la Charte des droits fondamentaux de l'Union européenne.

24-2 de la même loi : "(...)

This part of the applications has been struck out of the Court’s list of cases or declared inadmissible by the Court, sitting in a single-judge formation, assisted by a rapporteur as provided for in Article

This part of the applications has been struck out of the Court’s list of cases or declared inadmissible by the Court, sitting in a single-judge formation, assisted by a rapporteur as provided for in Article

This part of the applications has been struck out of the Court’s list of cases or declared inadmissible by the Court, sitting in a single-judge formation, assisted by a rapporteur as provided for in Article

This part of the applications has been struck out of the Court’s list of cases or declared inadmissible by the Court, sitting in a single-judge formation, assisted by a rapporteur as provided for in Article

    Le droit interne pertinent Constitution Article 24 § 2 «   Toutes les personnes ont droit (...) à un procès rendu publiquement sans délais injustifiés (...)

le bénéfice de la protection juridique prévue par la loi n° 72-662 du 13 juillet 1972 portant statut général des militaires, et notamment son article 24 ; 2°) de condamner l'Etat à lui verser la somme

Il invoquait les articles 24 § 2 (droit à un procès dans un délai raisonnable), 9   §   3 (sécurité juridique), 33 § 3 (droit à la propriété privée) et 14 (principe d’égalité) de la Constitution

La contradiction découle directement de l’article 6 § 3 d) de la Convention européenne des Droits de l’Homme au regard duquel doit s’interpréter l’article 24 § 2 de la Constitution espagnole conformément

  avril 2025, la Cour a décidé, en vertu de l’article 54 § 2 (b) du Règlement de la Cour, qu’avis de la requête devait être donné au Gouvernement russe.

This part of the applications has been struck out of the Court’s list of cases or declared inadmissible by the Court, sitting in a single-judge formation, assisted by a rapporteur as provided for in Article