Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. A.

to take as the start of the six ‑ month period the date when he or she first became aware or ought to have become aware of those circumstances rendering the remedy ineffective (see Paul and Audrey

Audrey Glover of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office.   2.

Nor can Article 35 § 1 be interpreted in a manner which would require an applicant to seize the Court of his complaint before his position in connection with the matter has been finally settled at the

Audrey Glover of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office.   2.     On 17 April 1991 the European Commission of Human Rights declared the application admissible.

In short, the inquiry must focus on matters directly causative of death and must, indeed, be confined to those matters alone ...” (Simon Brown LJ, Court of Appeal, R. v.

to take as the start of the six ‑ month period the date when he or she first became aware or ought to have become aware of those circumstances rendering the remedy ineffective (see Paul and Audrey

Olivier LEROY, avocat au barreau de TOULON *-*-*-*-* COMPOSITION DE LA COUR L'affaire a été débattue le 09 Avril 2026, en audience publique, les avocats ne s'y étant pas opposés, devant Madame Audrey

de la SELARL P & A, avocat au barreau de VANNES Monsieur [E] [D] né le 13 Août 1976 à [Localité 8] [Adresse 1] [Localité 7] Représenté par Me Louise AUBRET-LEBAS de la SELARL P & A, avocat

COUR D'APPEL DE BORDEAUX 2ème CHAMBRE CIVILE -------------------------- ARRÊT DU : 04 JUILLET 2024 N° RG 21/01694 - N° Portalis DBVJ-V-B7F-MALZ [S], [U] [F] [I] [H] c/

If a residence permit cannot be granted under this criteria, the Migration Board may instead decide to re-examine the matter.

Audrey Glover of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office.   2.

Audrey Glover of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office.   3.     On 14 October 1992 the European Commission of Human Rights declared the application admissible.

    Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.

    Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.

: à Maître [V] [M] de la SELARL BSV Maître [XH] [C] de la SELARL CABINET LAURENT [C] Maître [RB] [Y] de la SELARL [Y] AVOCATS & ASSOCIES Maître [OP] [N] de la SCP GARNIER - BAELE Maître Gaëlle LE MAT

    On 16 October 2010 the applicant’s lawyer complained to the Staropromyslovskiy District Court in Grozny of the investigators’ failure to effectively investigate the matter and to transfer

le compte personnel de 65 artistes-interprètes dont les noms sont énoncés en pages 23 et 24 de ses dernières écritures et reconnaît que 9 d'entre eux, à savoir Bernard Y..., Patrick Z..., Guy X..., Matt

THE LAW The Court recalls that, pursuant to Article 35 § 1 of the Convention, it may only deal with a matter “within a period of six months from the date on which the final decision was taken”.