ont délibéré et jugé, assistés de Mme Noémie MAHE, Commis Greffier, ENTRE : 1/ [Localité 1] [Adresse 1] Représenté par Me Barbara BADO ([Localité 2]) ayant comme correspondant Me Charles-Sébastien DUGUINE

Mario ĆEHIĆ against Croatia lodged on 7 March 2019 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the applicant’s complaint under Article 3 of the Convention that he was ill-treated by the police during

A lawyer was officially assigned during this period.   In 1992, the entire case file was handed over to the defence counsels of the 47 people charged (including the applicant).

September 2011 SUBJECT MATTER OF the CASE The application concerns the alleged unfairness of the criminal proceedings due to the systemic restriction imposed on the applicant’s right of access to a lawyer during

The applicant had therefore received sufficient linguistic assistance during the first interview with the Swedish Customs.

The conviction was largely based on the statements obtained from the applicant and her accomplices during the police questioning. The applicant’s appeals were to no avail.

During the criminal proceedings it was established that he had been diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia.

The headman of the neighborhood ( muhtar ) was present during the search. The applicant was arrested during the search and taken to a police station.

Were there administrative-law and/or civil-law remedies in place under domestic law that the applicant could have had recourse to in relation to the alleged police inactivity during the meeting and the

November 2011 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the alleged unfairness of the criminal proceedings due to the systemic restriction imposed on the applicant’s right of access to a lawyer during

A criminal investigation, in which the applicant had not had status of a victim and where the guards’ actions against the applicant during the riot had not been examined, found that, given the inmates’

During the breathalyser test, the applicant was asked by the police whether she had been driving the car, and she confirmed that she had been.

  Whether the requisite judicial control was incorporated in the original conviction Central issue before the Court: whether detention during Her Majesty's pleasure, given its nature and purpose,

However, in order to find a violation of Article 6, it was important to look more closely at the use that had been made of the reports during the trial.

A had not said anything to incriminate him when heard during the applicant’s trial.

Conduct of the criminal proceedings during the applicants’ detention 23.

soupçonner la société Indigo Weel d'avoir établi de fausses déclarations en douanes portant sur des bicyclettes importées de Chine entre octobre 2017 et mai 2019, afin d'éluder le paiement de droits anti-dumping

under prevention of terrorism legislation may, on request, have a lawyer present during interviews and do not have such adverse inferences drawn against them.