CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
TPX MLJ JCP REFERES
67eed716b848dd6814c5f828
2 avril 2025
TRIBUNAL JUDICIAIRE DE VERSAILLES TRIBUNAL DE PROXIMITÉ DE MANTES LA JOLIE [Adresse 3] [Localité 7] [Courriel 10] ☎ : [XXXXXXXX01] N° RG 24/00035 - N° Portalis DB22-W-B7I-SMAI ORDONNANCE
Page 3 sur 5
Cour d'Appel
Elle a introduit une demande de recherche en paternitéc/M. Y
6253ca1cbd3db21cbdd8a14a
8 novembre 2007
(attestations de Amara et Nacira C..., Mickaël D..., Mounir E..., Lakhdar F..., Chantal G..., Sandra B..., Smaïl H..., Lydia I..., J...
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-112944
12 avril 2011
EWEIDA and Shirley CHAPLIN against the United Kingdom lodged on 10 August and 29 September 2010 STATEMENT OF FACTS THE FACTS The first applicant, Ms Nadia Eweida, is a British national
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1201DEC002657013
1 décembre 2016
The Court has previously found a lack of “significant disadvantage” in the cases, where delay concerned the payment of a relatively small award: the amount in question was equal to or less than sums up
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0602DEC002119806
2 juin 2009
Irrespective of the type or amount of the claim, the provisions of the Civil Procedure Act concerning small claims shall apply in proceedings before a court.”
6ème chambre 2ème section
67f0242602fc178212f7e2d6
4 avril 2025
TRIBUNAL JUDICIAIRE DE PARIS [1] [1] Expéditions exécutoires délivrées le : à Me QUINTARD ; Me NGUYEN NGOC; Me MARTY; Me BOCK; Me LAMBERT; Me DAUCHEL; Me BONNEAU; Me VALLET; Me TIREL; Me ROGER; Me SMAIL
Chambre des Référés
678177896d34da2cbdcdaf8a
7 janvier 2025
exercice domicilié en cette qualité au siège social; assureur de EIFFAGE ENERGIE SYSTEMES (n° contrat 57098498) assureur de la société VOISIN PARCS ET JARDINS (n° contrat 54576617), représentée par Me Nadia
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0429DEC001701906
29 avril 2010
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0108JUD002365694
8 janvier 2004
Lice was a small town with a population of, very approximately, 5,000 people.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0929DEC002593306
29 septembre 2009
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0119JUD002420316
19 janvier 2023
In 2010 Mr Nadir was tried for the attempted murder of a police officer and was sentenced to seven years’ imprisonment for intentional wounding with aggravating circumstances.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-6434
12 septembre 2012
justify; border-bottom:1pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .sDF790F1E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } Information Note on the Court’s case-law No. 155 August-September 2012 Nada
ECLI:CEDH:001-223894
28 février 2023
Nonetheless, the court held that the relatively small reduction of the salaries had not affected the core of the right to receive a salary, which had remained intact and had not been rendered devoid.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1012JUD002060513
12 octobre 2023
Ali oglu Mammadov ( Nadir Əli oğlu Məmmədov – “the second applicant”), who were born in 1953 and 1980 respectively, live in Baku, and were represented by Mr K.
ECLI:CEDH:001-223892
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0515DEC002365694
15 mai 1995
The third applicant, Nadir Doman, is a Turkish national of Kurdish origin, born in 1964 and resident at Diyarbakir.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0731JUD003676206
31 juillet 2014
The Court notes that in applications nos. 3125/13, 10375/13 and 11356/13 the delay in enforcement concerned the payment of relatively small awards (UAH 638.08 – equivalent of EUR 41.49 in
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0415DEC005596912
15 avril 2014
I.no.1207/2007 of 4 June 2007 57658/12 03/09/2012 Nada PRGOMELJA 01/04/1970 Serbian The Municipal Court in Novi Pazar 1. P1.no.934/04 of 2 March 2005 2. P1.no.549/06 of 3 April 2006 3.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1212JUD003599509
12 décembre 2013
The applicant’s wife, Ms Nadiya Vasylivna Pogorila, expressed her wish to maintain the application of the deceased husband. THE FACTS THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 7.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0411JUD004252316
11 avril 2024
of his or her status as a “victim” unless the national authorities have acknowledged, either expressly or in substance, and then afforded redress for, the breach of the Convention (see, for instance, Nada