Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-212660
30 septembre 2021
30 septembre 2021
QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect of his correspondence with his lawyer, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention (see, for instance, Campbell
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-207449
8 décembre 2020
8 décembre 2020
QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his family life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-210890
31 mai 2021
31 mai 2021
She also submits that, contrary to Article 13 of the Convention, she did not have an effective remedy to contest the grievance of her right to freedom of expression. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-202142
6 mars 2020
6 mars 2020
speaker of the Serbian language, suffered discrimination in terms of his “private life” and/or a “right set forth by law” compared to practicing lawyers who were Ekavian speakers of the same language, contrary
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-169042
3 novembre 2016
3 novembre 2016
Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to freedom of expression contrary to Article 10 of the Convention? 2.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-206176
19 octobre 2020
19 octobre 2020
QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his family life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-206540
10 novembre 2020
10 novembre 2020
In particular, did Royal Decree 413/2014 and Order IET/1045/2014 produce retroactive effects that entailed a deprivation of the applicant company’s possessions contrary to Article 1 of Protocol No.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-245581
24 septembre 2025
24 septembre 2025
QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his private life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention, by the publication of his
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-179368
13 novembre 2017
13 novembre 2017
QUESTION tO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for family life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-177770
21 septembre 2017
21 septembre 2017
QUESTION tO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for her family life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention, in so far as the enforcement of the decision adopted
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-179383
14 novembre 2017
14 novembre 2017
Was the applicant’s right not to be required to perform compulsory labour, contrary to Article 4 of the Convention, respected in the present case?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-215684
18 janvier 2022
18 janvier 2022
The applicant complains under Articles 6 § 1 and Protocol No. 1 about the fact that the dismissal of her appeal was contrary to the law.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-218390
13 juin 2022
13 juin 2022
QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his family life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-177116
25 août 2017
25 août 2017
Has there been a violation of the applicants’ right to freedom of assembly, contrary to Article 11 of the Convention, on account of their conviction under Articles 220 § 6 and
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-218519
24 juin 2022
24 juin 2022
The applicant complains that he has been convicted twice for the same offence, contrary to Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 to the Convention.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-234541
27 mai 2024
27 mai 2024
QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his family life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention, having regard to the excessive length of custody
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-208518
12 février 2021
12 février 2021
QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his private life contrary to Article 8 of the Convention?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-201711
13 février 2020
13 février 2020
QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his family life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-212659
30 septembre 2021
30 septembre 2021
QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his family life contrary to Article 8 of the Convention on account of the refusal of the domestic
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-198319
11 octobre 2019
11 octobre 2019
xa0; Were the restrictions imposed by the State in the present case, purportedly pursuant to Article 5 of the Convention, applied for a purpose other than those envisaged by that provision, contrary
Source officiellePage 29 sur 1005