CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 19 octobre 2020

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA6BC7FA7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:right } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } Communicated on 19 October 2020 Published on 9 November 2020   FOURTH SECTION Application no. 48411/19 Erdinci CAERIDIN against Romania lodged on 23 August 2019 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns non-enforcement of court decisions setting the contact schedule between the applicant and his child. Following the couple’s divorce, the parents shared parental responsibility, the mother was awarded custody of the child, and the applicant was granted contact rights. According to the applicant, the mother alienated the child from him and the authorities were not sufficiently active to help him restore his relationship with his child. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his family life, contrary to Article   8 of the Convention? In particular, have the authorities (child protection authority, bailiff’s office, police, and domestic courts) provided sufficient assistance to the applicant for the enforcement of the decisions whereby the Constanţa District Court granted him contact rights with his child: the decision of 9   November 2017 (file no. 2919/212/2017) and the decision no. 4837 of 4   May 2018 (file no. 27033/212/2017)?