Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-114930
16 octobre 2009
16 octobre 2009
He also complains that his detention is in breach of Article 5 and that his expulsion from the Netherlands would be contrary to his rights under Article 8 of the Convention.
Source officielleCASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-49280
27 avril 1989
27 avril 1989
complained of the compulsory transfer of ownership of a piece of farmland which belonged to him and of the amount of compensation awarded to him in return, alleging an interference with his possessions contrary
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-171716
3 février 2017
3 février 2017
QUESTION tO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his family life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention, in so far as the enforcement of the decision adopted
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-195076
11 juillet 2019
11 juillet 2019
QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to freedom of expression, in particular his right to impart information and ideas, contrary to Article 10 of the Convention,
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-201480
28 janvier 2020
28 janvier 2020
QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicants’ right to freedom of expression contrary to Article 10 of the Convention due to them being ordered to pay damages following the
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-205309
22 septembre 2020
22 septembre 2020
QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Did the refusal of parental leave on account of the applicant’s sex amount to discrimination against him, contrary to Article 14 of the Convention read
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-196314
2 septembre 2019
2 septembre 2019
QUESTIONS tO THE PARTIES Has the applicant suffered discrimination, contrary to Article 1 of Protocol No. 12 to the Convention, on the ground of age (see, mutatis mutandis Carvalho Pinto de Sousa Morais
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-198332
8 octobre 2019
8 octobre 2019
QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his family life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-165594
13 juillet 2016
13 juillet 2016
The applicant complains that in case of his removal to Uzbekistan he would be subjected to treatment contrary to Article 3 of the Convention. QUESTIONS 1.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-180790
17 janvier 2018
17 janvier 2018
The applicant company alleges that the revision proceedings in question were in fact an appeal in disguise and that the other party in the proceedings obtained a rehearing of the case contrary to the provisions
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-187157
28 septembre 2018
28 septembre 2018
Has the applicant suffered discrimination on the ground of her pregnancy contrary to Article 1 Protocol No. 12 to the Convention? 2.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-186333
28 août 2018
28 août 2018
Has the applicant suffered discrimination on the ground of her ethnicity, contrary to Article 14 of the Convention?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-179986
8 décembre 2017
8 décembre 2017
QUESTIONS tO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to freedom of expression, contrary to Article 10 of the Convention, on account of his conviction under section 7 § 2 of the
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-179769
8 décembre 2017
8 décembre 2017
QUESTION tO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to freedom of expression, contrary to Article 10 of the Convention, on account of his conviction under section 7 § 2 of the Prevention
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-180158
15 décembre 2017
15 décembre 2017
Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to freedom of expression, in particular his right to impart information, contrary to Article 10 of the Convention ( Guja v.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-180515
4 janvier 2018
4 janvier 2018
Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his private life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention, given that no decision was given in due time on his request
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-161924
16 mars 2016
16 mars 2016
QUESTION tO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicants’ right to respect for their family life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-212091
10 septembre 2021
10 septembre 2021
QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his family life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention, in the light of the alleged protracted and ineffective
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-212301
13 septembre 2021
13 septembre 2021
Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his family life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-212304
13 septembre 2021
13 septembre 2021
Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his family life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention?
Source officiellePage 28 sur 1005