Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-196102
27 août 2019
27 août 2019
the restrictions allegedly imposed by the State in the present case, purportedly pursuant to Article 6 and/or 7 of the Convention, applied for a purpose other than those envisaged by that provision, contrary
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-179944
8 décembre 2017
8 décembre 2017
Has here been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for her private life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention, on account of the apparent impossibility to find out about
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-237805
30 septembre 2024
30 septembre 2024
xa0; QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Having regard to the cumulative effect of the “dangerous detainee” regime, imposed on the applicant since 28 March 2017 and ongoing, has he been subjected to treatment contrary
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-193935
20 mai 2019
20 mai 2019
Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his correspondence with the Court, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention? 2.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-187158
28 septembre 2018
28 septembre 2018
QUESTION tO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to freedom of expression contrary to Article 10 of the Convention (see mutatis mutandis , Kudeshkina v.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-161873
10 mars 2016
10 mars 2016
QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his private life contrary to Article 8 of the Convention?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-211636
15 juillet 2021
15 juillet 2021
QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for her family life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-217085
31 mars 2022
31 mars 2022
60537/15, 18 June 2019), has he been subjected to treatment contrary to Article 3 of the Convention (see, Piechowicz v. Poland , no. 20071/07, 17 April 2012)?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-208370
5 février 2021
5 février 2021
QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES Has the applicant suffered discrimination on the ground of his lack of war veteran status, contrary to Article 1 of Protocol No. 12 of the Convention?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-212602
22 septembre 2021
22 septembre 2021
QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect of his correspondence with his lawyer, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention (see, for instance, Campbell
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1990:0907DEC001296287
7 septembre 1990
7 septembre 1990
With regard to the lay assessors, there is no reason to doubt their personal impartiality in the absence of proof to the contrary.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0624DEC001720011
24 juin 2014
24 juin 2014
The applicant complained that she risked being subjected to treatment contrary to Article 3 of the Convention if removed to Morocco. 24.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0318DEC005845200
18 mars 2004
18 mars 2004
It noted in particular that the registered car owner did not only act contrary to section 103 § 2 of the Road Traffic Act if he gave false information, but also if he provided incomplete information or
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0228DEC002458794
28 février 1996
28 février 1996
In the absence of any evidence to the contrary, the Commission finds no reason to doubt the personal impartiality of these lay assessors.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0514DEC002184093
14 mai 1993
14 mai 1993
xa0; The applicants filed an appeal against this decision to the Swiss Asylum Appeals Commission (Schweizerische Asylrekurskommission) in which they claimed inter alia that, contrary
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1988:0308DEC001289487
8 mars 1988
8 mars 1988
#xa0; The applicant complains that his proposed deportation is in breach of his family rights, ensured by Articles 8 and 12 of the Convention, constitutes torture, inhuman and degrading treatment, contrary
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1988:0908DEC001293787
8 septembre 1988
8 septembre 1988
The applicants also allege that they had no effective remedy, contrary to Article 13 of the Convention. 4.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1990:0316DEC001621790
16 mars 1990
16 mars 1990
Experience moreover showed that he would then be subjected to torture and inhuman treatment contrary to Article 3 of the Convention. 2.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0513DEC001854291
13 mai 1992
13 mai 1992
COMPLAINTS The applicant complained that he had been denied a fair hearing by the trial court, contrary to Article 6 para. 1 of the Convention.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-187791
22 octobre 2018
22 octobre 2018
The opinion of a child over ten years old must be taken into account, except where it is contrary to his or her interests (Article 57). 2.
Source officiellePage 22 sur 1005