CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 22 septembre 2021

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } Published on 11 October 2021   SECOND SECTION Application no. 26605/19 Ruhi HALLAÇOĞLU against Turkey lodged on 10 April 2019 communicated on 22 September 2021 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the seizure of a letter sent by his lawyer to the applicant, who was detained at the time of events, on the ground that it contained photocopies of case file documents. Invoking Article 8 of the Convention, the applicant complains about the interception by the prison administration of the letter that his lawyer sent to him. QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect of his correspondence with his lawyer, contrary to Article   8 of the Convention (see, for instance,   Campbell v. the United Kingdom ,   25 March 1992, §§   32 ‑ 54, Series A no. 233; Ekinci and Akalın v. Turkey , no. 77097/01, §   47, 30 January 2007 and Eylem Kaya v. Turkey , no. 26623/07, § 61, 13   December 2016)?