During the safety interviews they denied any involvement in or knowledge of the events of 21   July.

    The applicants complained about their confinement in a metal cage in the courtroom during the criminal proceedings against them.

xa0;     13413/18* 07/03/2018 Andrey Yuryevich KULEV 1977     SIZO-2 Volgograd Region limitation on the frequency of short-term family visits, physical separation and supervision during

These arrangements made it impossible for him to confer with his lawyers during the hearings. During both hearings he also remained handcuffed.

Allegations of ill-treatment during arrest.

    On 28 May 2013 a former high-ranking official, Mr I.M, who had held the post of Minister of the Interior during the impugned events, was charged with abuse of official capacity.

officers during the events of 16 October 2003.

short-term family visits, refusal of long-term family visits   Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of placement in a metal cage during court hearings and in respect

In November 1999, amendments were introduced to the Civil Obligations Act, with the effect that all proceedings concerning claims for damages resulting from acts of the army or police during the war were

The applicant submits that during the questioning he was ill-treated by a police officer, who demanded that he give a statement.

As to the applicant’s vulnerability, this was not supported by the applicant’s conduct during the interviews and trials.

While the applicant was informed of his defence rights upon his arrest, he did not have a lawyer during that period.

They are handcuffed with their hands behind their backs every time their leave their cells, including during the walks.

In the same vein, the application further pertains to the alleged absence of the applicant’s lawyer during the investigative measures carried out in the course of the preliminary investigation stage (see

Ponomarenko (“the first applicant”) during his pre-trial detention.

    The applicants complained principally of the inadequate conditions of their detention during their transport.

During that meeting she had told J.Y. and the man in question that she had to visit Belgium.

Furthermore, the mother had not been obliged to be present during the questioning against her son’s express wishes.

The cell had no table, locker or hanging space and had been disinfected only once during the period of his detention.