CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 4 mai 2023

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s40F41F73 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s54AB6003 { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sE7C30868 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .sCBD1756B { height:51.65pt } .s34F9B7A7 { height:146.65pt } .sC3302DD8 { height:113.85pt } .s3E7F756B { height:58.75pt } .sA5F756B { height:54.35pt } Published on 30 May 2023   THIRD SECTION Application no.   12205/18 Sergey Aleksandrovich PONOMAREV against Russia and 44 other applications (see list appended) PROCEDURAL INFORMATION Following a preliminary examination of the admissibility of the applications on 4 May 2023, the Court decided, under Rule 54 § 2 (b) of the Rules of Court, that notice of the applications should be given to the Government of Russia. In the applications marked by an asterisk, other complaints were raised. This part of the applications has been struck out of the Court’s list of cases or declared inadmissible by the Court, sitting in a single-judge formation, assisted by a rapporteur as provided for in Article 24 § 2 of the Convention. In the enclosed list of applications, whenever an applicant is referred to using initials, this indicates that the Court has authorised anonymity for that person, whose identity will not be disclosed to the public (Rule 47 § 4). For further information on the procedure following communication of an application brought against Russia, subject of well-established case law of the Court, please refer to the Court’s website . SUBJECT MATTER The applications concern complaints raised under Article 8 § 1 of the Convention relating to restrictions on family visits in pre-trial detention facilities which are the subject of well-established case law of the Court (see Andrey Smirnov v. Russia, no. 43149/10, §§ 35-57, 13 February 2018, Resin v.   Russia, no. 9348/14, 18 December 2018, Chaldayev v. Russia, no.   33172/16, 28 May 2019, Pshibiyev and Berov v. Russia, no. 63748/13, 9   June 2020 and Mukhametov and others v. Russia, nos. 53404/18 and   3   others, 14 December 2021).   APPENDIX – STATEMENT OF FACTS List of applications raising complaints under Article 8 § 1 of the Convention (restrictions on family visits in pre-trial detention facilities) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth   Representative’s name and location Detention facility Type of restriction Other relevant information Other complaints under well-established case-law     12205/18* 09/02/2018 Sergey Aleksandrovich PONOMAREV 1978     SIZO-2 Moscow refusal of long-term family visits The applicant was detained in a remand prison between March 2014 and 19/12/2017       13413/18* 07/03/2018 Andrey Yuryevich KULEV 1977     SIZO-2 Volgograd Region limitation on the frequency of short-term family visits, physical separation and supervision during short-term family visits, refusal of long-term family visits 10/06/2017 – ongoing on the date when the application was lodged with the Court       18894/18* 05/04/2018 Yevgeniy Anatolyevich GUSEV 1983     SIZO-2 Vologda Region, SIZO-3 Vologda Region limitation on the frequency of short-term family visits, limitation on the length of short-term family visits, glass partition, poor quality of phone lines, refusal of long-term family visits, lack of ventilation On many occasions the applicant had short-term visits. On 12/05/2017 a court authorised a long-term visit, but the SIZO-3 administration refused to provide it. The period concerned ends on 15/04/2018 when the applicant left SIZO-3 Vologda Region Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - 14/03/2012-07/12/2017 and 14/04/2018-24/04/2018, multiple transfers between to/from the courthouse pending criminal proceedings (conditions of transport and detention in a holding cell in the courthouse): transfers in a single-occupancy compartment in a prison van, lack of fresh air, overcrowding   Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport     26925/18* 08/05/2018 Vladislav Ravilevich NIZAMUTDINOV 1971     SIZO-1 Republic of Tatarstan refusal of long-term family visits, refusal of short-term family visits the period at least until 11/12/2018       40655/18 22/07/2018 Albina Niyazovna GABBAZOVA 1986     SIZO-1 in St   Petersburg and Leningrad Region refusal of short-term family visits the applicant is a partner of a detainee; she repeatedly requested a visit since 26/01/2018, but to no avail. She appealed against the refusal under Art. 125 of the Code of the Criminal Procedure and on 22/05/2018, the St Petersburg City Court upheld the refusal   Art. 13 - lack of an effective remedy against refusals of short-term family visits.     4881/19 25/12/2018 Nikita Vladimirovich SAMOYLENKO 1997     SIZO-1 Kazan limitation on the frequency of short-term family visits Limitation on the frequency of short-term family visits between 18/07/2017 and 07/09/2018 (during the proceedings in the court of appeal) Art. 13 - lack of an effective remedy against refusals of short-term family visits     5291/19* 26/12/2018 Aleksey Leonidovich UDOVIK 1972     SIZO-1 Arkhangelsk Region physical separation and supervision during short-term family visits, limitation on the frequency of short-term family visits The applicant has been in pre-trial detention since 2015, mother, daughter and brother were allegedly prohibited from visiting him in 2015-2016. Scarce documents. It appears that since 2016, when the case was transferred to the trial court, the ban was upheld only in respect of his mother: the applicant was denied phone calls and visits from her, because at some point during the trial he passed her a letter, stating his view on his criminal prosecution.       8739/19 01/02/2019 Aleksandr Dmitriyevich POLKOVNIKOV 1989 Aleksandr Vasilyevich Artamonov Moscow SIZO-5 Moscow Region refusal of short-term family visits On 04/08/2018 the applicant’s counsel requested a short-term visit for the applicant’s mother. On 06/07/2018 the investigator refused. The applicant challenged the refusal under the CAS and under Article 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure but to no avail. Art. 13 - lack of an effective remedy against refusals of short-term family visits     21927/19 02/04/2019 Zinaida Timofeyevna YUSHKINA 1960     SIZO-3 Volgograd Region, refusal of any type of family visits (up until 2019), physical separation and supervision during short-term family visit provided in 2019 (following a decision of 24/12/2018) the applicant is a mother of a detainee, 02/11/2017 - 19/03/2019 Art. 13 - lack of an effective remedy against refusals of short-term family visits - in relation to refusal of family visits in pre-trial detention facility up until 2019 and restrictions on such visits (physical separation) in 2019   30417/19 20/05/2019 Artur Anatolyevich VALOV 1987     SIZO-1 Tatarstan Republic refusal of short-term family visits Between 25/04/2018 and 22/02/2019 the applicant was refused visits from his wife without any explanation. He challenged at least one of the refusals under Article 125 (first cassation appeal of 18/01/2019), his complaints we refused.     32238/19 07/06/2019 Mikhail Olegovich YEZHAKOV 1983 Oksana Vladimirovna Preobrazhenskaya Strasbourg SIZO-8 Sergiyev ‑ Posad refusal of any type of family visits no visits allowed for the applicant’s mother, 14/09/2018-22/04/2019 Art. 13 - lack of an effective remedy against refusals of short-term family visits - in pre-trial detention facility   43888/19* 03/08/2019 Renat Gumarovich GALIMOV 1987     SIZO-1 Kazan refusal of long-term family visits The applicant was held in pre-trial detention and requested a visit from his mother and wife (dd 10/12/2018). On 20/12/2018, the investigator refused. The applicant appealed against the decision. On 22/01/2019 the Vakhitovskiy District Court dismissed his claims. The applicant requested a visit and appealed several times. The latest: investigator’s refusal dated 22/03/2019; Vakhitovskiy District Court, 09/04/2019; Supreme Court of the Republic of Tatarstan, 21/05/2019. Art. 13 - 1 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of refusal of long-term family visits   57826/19* 05/11/2019 Dmitriy Aleksandrovich BEK 1992 Oksana Vladimirovna Preobrazhenskaya Strasbourg SIZO-1 Krasnodar physical separation and supervision during short-term family visits, refusal of long-term family visits The applicant was detained in SIZO-1 Krasnodar from 16/06/2017 to 28/09/2019. On 04/10/2019, the applicant was transferred to the correctional facility, following his conviction. Family members: wife and son. Art. 14 - in conjunction with Art. 8 - discriminatory treatment compared with convicted prisoners as regards duration of short-term family visits and absence of long-term family visits     Art. 8 (1) - permanent video surveillance of detainees in pre-trial or post-conviction detention facilities - SIZO-1 Krasnodar, 16/03/2017 to 28/09/2019, opposite-sex operators     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - in respect of restrictions on visits in remand prisons   64521/19 29/11/2019 Islam Magomed-Salyakhovich BIGAYEV 1994 Khava Lomelyevna TASUYEVA 1975   Sergey Aleksandrovich Minenkov Moscow IZ-4 Moscow refusal of family visits The applicants are the wife and a son of B., who has been a defendant in criminal proceedings and has been in pre-trial detention since 29/03/2019. On 29/05/2019 B.’s counsel submitted an application for a family visit on behalf of the applicants. On the same day the investigator refused the request stating, inter alia, that B. could use the visit to obstruct the investigation and that the investigator had discretion to authorise visits but was not obliged to do so. On 29/08/2019 the Tverskoy District Court of Moscow dismissed the applicants’ complaint. Art. 13 - lack of an effective remedy against refusals of short-term family visits   5191/20* 20/12/2019 Aleksandr Viktorovich YERKHOV 1983   Yekaterina Vladimirovna YERKHOVA 1990   Viktor Aleksandrovich YERKHOV 1960   Nadezhda Ivanovna YERKHOVA 1960 Olga Germanovna Podoplelova Moscow IZ-4 Rostov-on-Don refusal of any type of family visits the applicants are a detainee (in pre-trial detention since 02/02/2019), his parents and wife Art. 13 - lack of an effective remedy against refusals of short-term family visits - in respect of refusals of family visits in pre-trial detention facility   5879/20* 16/01/2020 Tatyana Vasilyevna KORABELNIKOVA 1964 Sergey Vasilyevich Brovchenko Moscow SIZO-5, Moscow refusal of short-term family visits The applicant is a wife of a detainee. Refusals of short-term family visits on 04/12/2018, 13/12/2018, 21/12/2018, 31/01/2019. On 27/03/2019 the Basmannyy District Court of Moscow dismissed the applicant’s complaint (upheld on appeal on 17/07/2019, Moscow City Court). Art. 13 - lack of an effective remedy against refusals of short-term family visits   6588/20* 17/01/2020 Yelena Yevgenyevna GUSAKOVA 1956     SIZO-1 St Petersburg refusal of long-term family visits The applicant is a detainee’s mother. Art. 14 - in conjunction with Art. 8 - discriminatory treatment compared with convicted prisoners as regards duration of short-term family visits and absence of long-term family visits   8864/20* 03/02/2020 Viktoriya Viktorovna SKRIPNIK 1985     SIZO-1 St Petersburg refusal of short-term family visits 09/02/2019 - 15/10/2019. At the relevant time the applicant was a fiancée of a detainee. She was also a witness in his criminal case. Her visits to the pre-trial detention facility were refused based on the fact that her communication with the accused could influence the investigation. The visits were refused for at least a year, which appears to be excessive, even though she is a witness in the case. Art. 13 - lack of an effective remedy against refusals of short-term family visits   Art. 14 - in conjunction with Art. 8 - discriminatory treatment compared with convicted prisoners as regards duration of short-term family visits and absence of long-term family visits   9971/20* 04/02/2020 Ramil Ravilevich ABDULLIN 1986     SIZO-5 Tatarstan Republic refusal of short-term family visits Refusal of visits of a partner; Grounds for refusal to provide visits: no registered marriage, the applicant’s unwillingness to admit his guilt and to co-operate with the investigation. Attempts to challenge the refusals in courts were to no avail.     13147/20 25/02/2020 Daniil Timurovich AKBEROV 1997     SIZO-2 Moscow, SIZO-5 Moscow, SIZO-2 Kaluga Region, SIZO-1 Yaroslavl Region, SIZO-1 Republic of Tatarstan physical separation and supervision during short-term family visits, refusal of long-term family visits, impossibility of phone communications The applicant’s father remained in pre-trial detention facilities till 17/11/2019. Art. 13 - lack of an effective remedy against refusals of short-term family visits and in respect of long terms visits   25909/20* 11/06/2020 Irina Anatolyevna ANIKEYEVA 1956     SIZO-1 Arkhangelsk Region refusal of long-term family visits, physical separation and supervision during short-term family visits The applicant is a detainee’s mother Art. 13 - lack of an effective remedy against refusals of short-term family visits - without the glass barrier and of long terms visits     Art. 14 - in conjunction with Art. 8 - discriminatory treatment compared with convicted prisoners as regards duration of short-term family visits and absence of long-term family visits   27083/20* 19/03/2020 Yelena Anatolyevna VYSOTSKAYA 1970 Denis Yuryevich VYSOTSKIY 1989 Aleksandr Vladimirovich Kiryanov Taganrog SIZO-2, Rostov Region refusal of long-term family visits the applicant is the mother of a detainee, 11/11/2019-22/02/2020 Art. 14 - in conjunction with Art. 8 - discriminatory treatment compared with convicted prisoners as regards duration of short-term family visits and absence of long-term family visits   32403/20* 07/06/2020 Yevgeniya Victorovna ANIKEYEVA 1982     SIZO-1 Arkhangelsk Region physical separation and supervision during short-term family visits, refusal of long-term family visits The applicant is the wife of detainee Art. 13 - lack of an effective remedy against refusals of short-term family visits and in respect of long-term visits   Art. 14 - in conjunction with Art. 8 - discriminatory treatment compared with convicted prisoners as regards duration of short-term family visits and absence of long-term family visit   34205/20* 22/07/2020 Vasiliy Vyacheslavovich DVIRNIK 1990     SIZO-5 Moscow SIZO-1 Tatarstan Republic SIZO-5 Tatarstan Republic physical separation and supervision during short-term family visits, limitation on the frequency of short-term family visits From 29/10/2015 to 11/02/2021 From 2018 to 2020 there was a limitation on the frequency of the short-term visits (partner and child).     2658/21 17/12/2020 Svetlana Petrovna MIROSHNICHENKO 1980     SIZO-1 Republic of Mordovia refusal of short-term family visits The applicant is a detainee’s wife. He has been in pre-trial detention since 10/08/2021 (only two visits were granted). Her relevant complaints were dismissed by domestic courts. Art. 13 - lack of an effective remedy against refusals of short-term family visits   8681/21* 09/01/2021 Mariya Aleksandrovna SHILOVA 1985     SIZO-1 St Petersburg physical separation and supervision during short-term family visits, limitation on the frequency of short-term family visits The applicant’s husband was detained in SIZO between 30/03/2016 and 09/09/2020 . Visits were allegedly limited to one hour, there had been a glass barrier preventing any physical contact, and in the presence of the SIZO staff member.     20628/21* 01/04/2021 Yelena Adolfovna VASHUKOVA 1963     SIZO-1 Arkhangelsk Region refusal of long-term family visits the applicant is a detainee’s mother Art. 14 - in conjunction with Art. 8 - discriminatory treatment compared with convicted prisoners as regards duration of short-term family visits and absence of long-term family visits     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - in respect of refusals of long-term family visits in pre-trial detention   32409/21* 24/05/2021 Ilnaz Ildusovich ZABBAROV 1994 Elik Yevgenyevich Abdrashitov Orel IZ-1 Orenburg limitation on the frequency of short-term family visits, refusal of short-term family visits, physical separation and supervision during short-term family visits Since April 2020 - restrictions in visits, since November 2020 - no visits. Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of placement in a metal cage during court hearings;     Art. 3 - use of metal cages and/or other security arrangements in courtrooms - Privolzhskiy District Court of Kazan, Supreme Court of the Kazakhstan Republic (video link), from 09/04/2020 to 23/03/2021   34680/21* 28/06/2021 Komil Karimovich MATIYEV 1980     SIZO-2 Tatarstan Republic refusal of long-term family visits, physical separation and supervision during short-term family visits The applicant has been detained since 14/03/2017. On 05/02/2021 he was convicted by the Privolzhskiy Circuit Military Court. On 05/04/2021 the Appellate Military Court refused to grant the request of the applicant’s wife for a long-term visit in SIZO-2.     36406/21* 28/06/2021 Elkhan Novruz ogly SHIRIYEV 1994     SIZO-1 Krasnoyarsk Region physical separation and supervision during short-term family visits, refusal of long-term family visits The applicant requested long-term visits on several occasions from the SIZO administration and judges but to no avail. He is in detention on remand since 01/01/2020. Art. 14 - in conjunction with Art. 8 - discriminatory treatment compared with convicted prisoners as regards duration of short-term family visits and absence of long-term family visits   36524/21 09/07/2021 Irina Ivanovna DOMANOVA 1984 Aleksey Leonidovich KRISHTOPA 1980   Oksana Vladimirovna Preobrazhenskaya Strasbourg SIZO-1 Stavropol Region limitation on the frequency of short-term family visits The applicants are partners. The second applicant has been in detention since 04/03/2021. The applicants were allowed short-term visits on 10/03/2021 and 18/03/2021. Later, on 25/03/2021, 28/04/2021, 06/05/2021, 18/05/2021, 27/05/2021, they were refused with no meaningful explanation Art. 13 - lack of an effective remedy against refusals of short-term family visits - in respect of restrictions on visits in remand prison   43710/21* 09/08/2021 Artem Arslanovich KHAMIDULLIN 1981     SIZO-2, Kazan, Tatarstan Republic refusal of short-term family visits Refusals of short-term family visits with his mother, wife, sister. Several refusals of investigator, last one on 15/12/2020 (upheld on 30/07/2021 by the Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic) Art. 13 - lack of an effective remedy against refusals of short-term family visits   49163/21 29/09/2021 Svetlana Petrovna PYATANOVA 1985     SIZO-1 Republic of Mordovia refusal of short-term family visits The applicant’s husband is detained in SIZO-1 Republic of Mordovia since 06/02/2019.     51492/21* 27/09/2021 Kirill Valentinovich KUCHINSKIY 1986     SIZO-4 Arkhangelsk Region refusal of long-term family visits, physical separation and supervision during short-term family visits The applicant is in pre-trial detention since 26/05/2015 - ongoing on the date when the application was lodged with the Court. He complains about refusal of long-term visits from his mother and about modalities of short-term meetings with her Art. 14 - prohibition of discrimination - in conjunction with Art. 8 - discriminatory treatment compared with convicted prisoners as regards modalities of short-term family visits and absence of long-term family visits   Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities and against refusals of long-term family visits and modalities of short-term family visits   Art. 5 (4) - excessive length of judicial review of detention - Appeal against the decision by the Arkhangelsk Regional Court of 16/09/2021 considered by the Second Appellate Court on 21/10/2021; Appeal against the decision of the Arkhangelsk Regional Court, 24/12/2021 was considered by the Second Appellate Court on 03/02/2022   Art. 8 (1) - permanent video surveillance of detainees in pre-trial or post-conviction detention facilities - SIZO-4 Arkhangelsk Region, 01/10/2021- ongoing on the date when the application was lodged with the Court, opposite-sex operators, detention in different cells with video surveillance, video surveillance in a lavatory and/or shower room   51669/21* 04/10/2021 Valentina Anatolyevna DANILOVA 1959     SIZO-1 Arkhangelsk Region physical separation and supervision during short-term family visits, refusal of long-term family visits The applicant is the mother of a detainee. Her requests to see her son were to no avail. The latest reply from FSIN was on 29/06/2021; 28/05/2015 - ongoing on the date when the application was lodged with the Court Art. 14 - in conjunction with Art. 8 - discriminatory treatment compared with convicted prisoners as regards duration of short-term family visits and absence of long-term family visits   Art. 13 - lack of an effective remedy against refusals of short-term family visits.   58607/21 14/09/2021 Aleksandr Aleksandrovich AGEYEV 1978     SIZO-1, Tver Region refusal of long-term family visits The app. is serving life sentence in IK-18, Yamalo-Nenetsk Autonomous Region. In August 2019 the applicant was transferred to SIZO-1, Tver Region, for court proceeding in respect of other crimes he had been charged with. On 02/08/2021 the applicant lodged a request to grant a long-term visit with his wife, who lives in Tver. The request was dismissed. Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - lack of an effective remedy against refusals of family visits in remand prisons   4078/22 30/12/2021 Ilnur Amirovich FAYZULIN 1994 Natalya Vasilyevna Alekseyeva Krasnoyarsk SIZO-1 Krasnoyarsk refusal of long-term family visits no long-term family visits were allowed pending criminal proceedings. The applicant has been in detention since 12/03/2021. Art. 14 - in conjunction with Art. 8 - discriminatory treatment compared with convicted prisoners as regards duration of short-term family visits and absence of long-term family visits   7144/22* 12/01/2022 Sabina Sergeyevna KARETNIKOVA 1989     SIZO-1 Arkhangelsk Region refusal of short-term family visits, refusal of long-term family visits, physical separation and supervision during short-term family visits The applicant is the wife of a detainee. Art. 14 - in conjunction with Art. 8 - discriminatory treatment compared with convicted prisoners as regards duration of short-term family visits and absence of long-term family visits   17635/22* 09/03/2022 Georgiy Vladimirovich LADARIYA 1979     SIZO-4 Arkhangelsk Region refusal of long-term family visits, physical separation and supervision during short-term family visits Detention since 15/01/2015 Art. 13 - lack of an effective remedy against refusals of short-term family visits     Art. 14 - in conjunction with Article 8 - discriminatory treatment compared with convicted prisoners as regards duration of short-term family visits and absence of long-term family visits   21811/22* 08/04/2022 Aleksandr Andreyevich VASHUKOV 1989     SIZO-1 Arkhangelsk Region refusal of long-term family visits, physical separation and supervision during short-term family visits The applicant is a brother of a detainee. On 18/01/2022 the FSIN refused a long-term family visit. Art. 14 - in conjunction with Article 8 - discriminatory treatment compared with convicted prisoners as regards duration of short-term family visits and absence of long-term family visits     25229/22 28/04/2022 Nadezhda Viktorovna GERASIMOVA 1961     SIZO-1, Arkhangelsk Region refusal of long-term family visits The applicant is the mother of a detainee Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law – in respect of refusals of long-term family visits   Art. 14 - in conjunction with Article 8 - discriminatory treatment compared with convicted prisoners as regards duration of short-term family visits and absence of long-term family visits   29351/22 20/05/2022 Andrey Sergeyevich ZHIGULSKIY 1996     SIZO-1 Krasnoyarsk, refusal of long-term family visits, physical separation and supervision during short-term family visits visits from parents and a partner, since 08/08/2019 Art. 14 - in conjunction with Article 8 - discriminatory treatment compared with convicted prisoners as regards duration of short-term family visits and absence of long-term family visits   30067/22* 10/05/2022 Dmitriy Yevgenyevich SUKHORUKOV 1968 Yaroslavna Nikolayevna Sukhorukova Myskhako SIZO-3, Novorossiysk physical separation and supervision during short-term family visits Conviction on 24/03/2021, Oktyabrskiy District Court of Novorossiysk, upheld on appeal, 18/11/2021 by the Krasnodar Regional Court Art. 3 - use of metal cages and/or other security arrangements in courtrooms - Krasnodar Regional Court between 20/07/2021 and 18/11/2021 via video-link from SIZO-3, Novorossiysk; relevant judgment date 18/11/2021, Krasnodar Regional Court   30978/22* 16/06/2022 Yuliya Olegovna TARKHANOVA 1983     SIZO-1 Moscow refusal of long-term family visits, refusal of short-term family visits, refusal of telephone conversations, physical separation and supervision during short-term family visits the applicant is a wife of a detainee, since 17/02/2021 – ongoing on the date when the application was lodged with the Court     35019/22 20/05/2022 Andrey Igorevich IVANOV 1996     SIZO-1 Krasnoyarsk refusal of long-term family visits, physical separation and supervision during short-term family visits visits from the mother, brother and grandmother, since 07/08/2019 Art. 14 - in conjunction with Article 8 - discriminatory treatment compared with convicted prisoners as regards duration of short-term family visits and absence of long-term family visits