into account the interests of the child.

    The fate of the child 49.

It must be remembered that the child was abducted by the mother in June 2005 . The child has not seen his father in almost two years.

On 8 March 2010 the Judenburg District Court awarded D.P. sole custody of the child. 2.

of the child, not the anonymous sperm donor.

The child was using vulgar language and was restless and anxious. The child had told her mother about things that her father did to her.

a psychologist for the child and the father.

In the course of the proceedings the applicant contended that the child’s mother had not taken care of the child.

He recognised the child, but his recognition did not get the compulsory approval of the District Court judge, who relied on the legal presumption favouring the husband’s paternity given that the child

  However, the child was kept in care.

Following the couple’s divorce, the parents shared parental responsibility, the mother was awarded custody of the child, and the applicant was granted contact rights.

from the habitual residence and the refusal of the Moldovan courts to order his return under the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International   Child Abduction.

AU NOM DU PEUPLE FRANCAIS LA COUR DE CASSATION, TROISIEME CHAMBRE CIVILE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Sur le pourvoi formé par la commune de Saint-Chély d'Apcher (Lozère), représentée par son maire

On 27 May 2009 a child was born to the applicant’s partner (“the mother”) in Slovakia. The applicant is the father of the child. The child is both a Slovak and a Spanish national. 7.

The hospital in which the applicant was to give birth was asked to inform the child welfare services as soon as the child had been born. 7.

In September 2016 the child had reiterated to the psychologist at the psychiatric clinic that he wanted to stay in Greece.

child support and child support arrears ( skola už vaiko išlaikymą ) by the applicant.

After the birth of the child, the applicant continued living together in the same household with E.G. and the child, caring for him. However, in February 2022, the applicant and E.G. separated.

The child was attending kindergarten. His father’s family was very attached to the child and he was able to develop well.