The Court refers to the principles established in its case-law regarding cramped and defective conditions during the transit of prisoners (see Tomov and Others v.

    The applicants complained about their confinement in a metal cage in the courtroom during the criminal proceedings against them.

During the questioning several police officers beat her up and tried to rape her.

Court of St   Petersburg, Moskovskiy District Court of St   Petersburg, St   Petersburg City Court 29/08/2022   19/07/2017 29/08/2022 Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during

The bullet remained in his body during the whole period he was deprived of his liberty (including during the period he was transferred to a prison following his conviction by the first ‑ instance

#Renvoi préjudiciel – Recevabilité – Dumping – Importations de chaussures à dessus en cuir originaires de Chine et du Viêt Nam – Validité du règlement (CE) no 1472/2006 et du règlement d’exécution (UE)

During the examination of the case on appeal, in which the applicant participated by means of a video link from the detention facility, the applicant was also confined in a metal cage.

    The applicants complained principally of the inadequate conditions of detention during their transport.

RG 2026023538 ENTRE : 1) SARL TRANSPORTS VIGNERON, dont le siège social est [Adresse 1] - RCS B 341907269 Partie demanderesse : comparant par le Cabinet [Adresse 2], représentée par Me Sébastien Duguine

    The applicants complained principally of the inadequate conditions of detention during their transport. They relied on Article 3 of the Convention. 8.

    The applicants complained principally of the inadequate conditions of detention during their transport. They relied on Article 3 of the Convention. 8.

  APPENDIX – STATEMENT OF FACTS List of applications raising complaints under Article 3 of the Convention (inadequate conditions of detention during transport) No. Application no.

Russia , no. 38004/12, 17 July 2018, as regards placement of detainees in a metal cage or a glass cabin during court hearings; Reshetnyak v.

Turkey 06/06/2017 Lack of reasonable suspicion Restriction of access to the investigation file Lack of hearing during the detention review Failure/delay in examining requests for enlargement/objection

  Since then, nuisance in the form of smell had occurred from time to time until 1989, especially during the summer of 1989.

    During the trial, the applicant denied any connection with the PKK.

During his stay in that prison he was subjected to various forms of ill-treatment (he was held in a punishment cell during seven months, he was handcuffed during first two months of his detention, he was

    The applicants complained principally of the inadequate conditions of detention during their transport. They relied on Article 3 of the Convention. 8.

  38004/12, §§ 145-50 and 166-72, 17 July 2018, as regards detention in a metal cage or glass cabin during court hearings and inability to communicate freely and privately with a lawyer during the