CEDHCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 1 juin 2023
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-225611
- Date
- 1 juin 2023
- Publication
- 1 juin 2023
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleCommunicated
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s40F41F73 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s54AB6003 { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sE7C30868 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s5FFF0A77 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:1pt } Published on 26 June 2023   FOURTH SECTION Application no.   19753/18 Andrey Aleksandrovich ZUBAREV against Russia and 30 other applications (see list appended) PROCEDURAL INFORMATION Following a preliminary examination of the admissibility of the applications on 1 June 2023, the Court decided, under Rule 54 § 2 (b) of the Rules of Court, that notice of the applications should be given to the Government of Russia. In the applications marked by an asterisk, other complaints were raised. This part of the applications has been struck out of the Court’s list of cases or declared inadmissible by the Court, sitting in a single-judge formation, assisted by a rapporteur as provided for in Article 24 § 2 of the Convention. In the enclosed list of applications, whenever an applicant is referred to using initials, this indicates that the Court has authorised anonymity for that person, whose identity will not be disclosed to the public (Rule 47 § 4). For further information on the procedure following communication of an application brought against Russia, subject of well-established case law of the Court, please refer to the Court’s website . SUBJECT MATTER The applications concern complaints raised under Article 3 of the Convention relating to use of metal cages and/or other security arrangements in courtrooms which are the subject of well-established case law of the Court (see Svinarenko and Slyadnev v. Russia [GC], nos. 32541/08 and 43441/08, ECHR 2014 (extracts) and Vorontsov and Others v. Russia, no. 59655/14 and   2 others, 31 January 2017).   APPENDIX – STATEMENT OF FACTS List of applications raising complaints under Article 3 of the Convention (use of metal cages and/or other security arrangements in courtrooms) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth Representative’s name and location Name of the court Date of the relevant judgment Start date End date Other complaints under well-established case-law     19753/18* 20/04/2018 Andrey Aleksandrovich ZUBAREV 1985     Cherepovets Town Court, by way of a video conference from a detention facility 17/01/2018 17/01/2018 17/01/2018       13730/19* 26/02/2019 Aleksandr Aleksandrovich ZAYTSEV 1985     Vsevolzhskiy Town Court of the Leningrad Region, Kalininskiy District Court of St   Petersburg, Moskovskiy District Court of St   Petersburg, St   Petersburg City Court 29/08/2022   19/07/2017 29/08/2022 Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - train, convoy cells, numerous occasions, 19/07/2017 - 22/02/2019, from the detention centres to the courthouses, inadequate temperature, lack of fresh air, no or restricted access to toilet, overcrowding, passive smoking, 0.3 - 0.75 sq. m. of personal space;   Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport;   Art. 5 (3) - excessive length of pre-trial detention - 19/07/2017 - 29/08/2022, Vsevolzhskiy Town Court of the Leningrad Region, Kalininskiy District Court of St Petersburg, Moskovskiy District Court of St Petersburg, St   Petersburg City Court, the Second Appeal Court, failure to conduct the proceedings diligently leading to excessive length of detention on remand.     23496/19* 17/04/2019 Aleksandr Anatolyevich ILYIN 1993 Aleksey Mikhaylovich Urlashov St Petersburg Leningrad Regional Court, Vyborg Town Court of the Leningrad Region 06/02/2019 04/07/2017 06/02/2019 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of placement in a metal cage during court hearing.s     45032/21* 18/01/2022 Roman Vladimirovich CHERNOKNIZHNYY 1979     Supreme Court of the Republic of Komi, the applicant placed in a glass cabin with metal structure measuring 3.5 m x 2   m x 2 m and holding four co-defendants (including the applicant), absence of ventilation, stagnant air, poor audibility 20/12/2021 Pending on the date when the application was lodged with the Court Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of placement in a metal cage during court hearings.     45145/21* 26/08/2021 Anton Yuryevich PILISHEK 1982     Sverdlovskiy District Court Krasnoyarsk 08/04/2021 12/02/2021 08/04/2021 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of placement in a metal cage during court hearings.     45772/21 31/08/2021 Valeriya Aleksandrovna USTYANTSEVA 2000 Aleksandr Vitalyevich Urychev Chelyabinsk Troitsk Town Court of the Chelyabinsk Region 27/07/2021 05/02/2021 27/07/2021 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of placement in a metal cage during court hearings.     47328/21* 26/11/2021 Aleksandr Sergeyevich IVANOV 1972     Murmansk Regional Court, by way of a video conference from a detention facility 01/06/2021 01/06/2021 01/06/2021       49687/21* 18/10/2021 Aleksandr Vladimirovich BELOV 1985     Tsentralniy District Court of Krasnoyarsk, Sverdlovskiy District Court of Krasnoyarsk   30/11/2020 pending on the date when the application was lodged       49972/21* 07/09/2021 Aleksey Anatolyevich BELYAYEV 1979     Sosnogorst Town Court of the Republic of Komi, by way of video conference from a detention facility   10/08/2021 13/08/2021     51173/21* 16/09/2021 Aleksandr Yuryevich CHICHERYUKIN 1967     Supreme Court of the Republic of Komi, the Second Appellate Court of General Jurisdiction; by way of a video conference from a detention facility 17/08/2021 28/04/2021 17/08/2021     51372/21* 20/09/2021 Aleksandr Vasilyevich ZVEREV 1960     Ivdel Town Court of the Sverdlovsk Region, by way of a video conference from a detention facility 08/07/2021 08/07/2021 08/07/2021 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of placement in a metal cage during court hearings.   53247/21* 23/09/2021 Vladimir Vladimirovich PROSIN 1982     Justice of the Peace of Court Circuit no. 1 of the Barabinskiy District of the Novosibirsk Region 25/08/2021 25/08/2021 25/08/2021     53623/21* 28/12/2021 Aleksandr Alekseyevich GRIBKOV 1990     Justice of the Peace of the Severodvinsk Judicial District no. 8 of the Arkhangelsk Region 30/09/2021   30/09/2021 30/09/2021 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of placement in a metal cage during court hearings   55102/21* 15/10/2021 Elshan Israfil ogly GULIYEV 1976     Krasnoyarsk Regional Court, Fifth Appellate Court of General Jurisdiction 16/08/2021 05/02/2020 16/08/2021     55977/21* 14/10/2021 Anton Vladimirovich SHISHKIN 1982     Leninskiy District Court of Kirov, Kirov Regional Court, Sixth Cassation Court 20/04/2021 27/01/2020 20/04/2021 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of placement in a metal cage during court hearings.   56820/21* 15/10/2021 Leonid Andreyevich TSAREV 1984     Ukhta Town Court of the Republic of Komi, Supreme Court of the Republic of Komi 02/09/2021 25/05/2021 02/09/2021 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of placement in a metal cage during court hearings.   56851/21* 01/03/2022 Sergey Yulyevich SOLDATOV 1975     Supreme Court of the Republic of Komi, Second Appellate Court of General Jurisdiction 01/12/2020 01/09/2021 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of placement in a metal cage during court hearings.   57505/21* 08/11/2021 Aleksey Yuryevich KURDYUKOV 1976     Chusovoy Town Court of the Perm Region, by way of a video conference from a detention facility 23/06/2021 23/06/2021 23/06/2021     5739/22 18/12/2021 Ivan Vladimirovich RUMYANTSEV 1980     Krasnoperekopskiy District Court of Yaroslavl   21/11/2021 Pending on the date when the application was lodged with the Court Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of placement in a metal cage during court hearings.   5793/22 30/12/2021 Yelena Anatolyevna VOYEVODINA 1974     Cherepovets Town Court of the Vologda Region 16/12/2021 Pending on the date when the application was lodged with the Court     6401/22* 10/12/2021 Valeriy Aleksandrovich KOLOMEYETS 1960     Nizhnevartovskiy District Court of the Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Region - Yugra 17/06/2021 15/01/2021 17/06/2021 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of placement in a metal cage during court hearings.   8460/22* 13/01/2022 Dmitriy Georgiyevich CHUMACHENKO 1997 Pavel Markovich Pliskin St Petersburg Military Court of the 224 Garrison 16/07/2021     12/03/2021 16/07/2021     9129/22* 17/01/2022 Yevgeniy Favadisovich MINYAZEV 1987     Tosno Town Court of the Leningrad Region, Leningrad Regional Court   11/08/2021 Pending on the date when the application was lodged with the Court Art. 8 (1) - permanent video surveillance of detainees in pre-trial or post-conviction detention facilities - IVS Tosno, Leningrad Region, 27/07/2021, 11/08/2021, 24/08/2021, 06/10/2021, 19/10/2021, 25/11/2021, 23/12/2021, 13/01/2022, video surveillance in a lavatory, detention in different cells with video surveillance, opposite-sex operators   Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of placement in a metal cage during court hearings and in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities;   Art. 5 (4) - excessive length of judicial review of detention - ( Idalov v. Russia [GC], no. 5826/03, §§   154 ‑ 158, 22 May 2012): on 06/10/2021 the Leningrad Regional Court examined the applicant’s appeal statement against the detention order of the Tosno Town Court of the Leningrad Regions of 11/08/2021.   9777/22* 11/02/2022 Aleksey Aleksandrovich MATVEYEV 1987     Oktyabrskiy District Court of Krasnoyarsk 23/12/2021 21/10/2020 23/12/2021 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of placement in a metal cage during court hearings.   9780/22* 26/01/2022 Kamandar Dzhabir Ogly BAYRAMOV 1995     Sovetskiy District Court of Krasnoyarsk   16/11/2019 Pending on the date when the application was lodged with the Court Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of placement in a metal cage during court hearings.   10672/22* 01/02/2022 Vyacheslav Igorevich VASHCHENKO 1975     Yaroslavskiy District Court of the Yaroslavl Region 24/09/2021 24/09/2021 24/09/2021     11064/22 03/02/2022 Nikolay Georgiyevich PECHENOV 1988     Zelenogorsk Town Court of the Krasnoyarsk Region 11/01/2022 03/12/2021 11/01/2022 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of placement in a metal cage during court hearings.   35266/22* 05/07/2022 Yelena Viktorovna BAZYUK 1983 Maksim Fedorovich Starchenko Ukhta Supreme Court of the Republic of Komi, by way of a video conference from a detention facility 15/04/2022 12/04/2022 15/04/2022     35476/22 25/04/2022 Semen Vladimirovich YATSYK 1999     Kirovskiy District Court of Krasnoyarsk 31/03/2022 21/02/2022 31/03/2022 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of placement in a metal cage during court hearings.   35481/22 29/04/2022 Yegor Sergeyevich MONAYENKOV 1987     Tsentralniy District Court of Krasnoyarsk, Krasnoyarsk Regional Court 25/04/2022 12/04/2021 25/04/2022     6858/23* 27/01/2023 Ruslan Rustamovich SAFIN 1986 Elik Yevgenyevich Abdrashitov Orel Vakhitovskiy District Court of Kazan, Supreme Court of the Republic of Tatarstan   20/09/2017 05/12/2022 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of placement in a metal cage during court hearings;   Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - van, 20/09/2017 - 05/12/2022, overcrowding, inadequate temperature, no or restricted access to toilet, 0.16 sq. m. of personal space;   Art. 5 (3) - excessive length of pre-trial detention - the applicant was detained in a remand prison from 20/09/2017 to 05/12/2022 on the charges of extortion; failure to conduct the proceedings diligently leading to excessive length of detention on remand.    Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
- Date
- 1 juin 2023
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-225611
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel