AU NOM DU PEUPLE FRANCAIS LA COUR DE CASSATION, CHAMBRE SOCIALE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Sur le premier moyen : Attendu qu'engagée le 11 septembre 1986, par la société Socoloir, Mme X... a

The Government did not contend that Ms Gerda Sokolov had no standing to pursue the case.

Buralux, dirigée par Roger A..., et des villes allemandes en vue de l'exportation de déchets vers la France, le projet prévoyant également de transformer en décharge des mines de lignite situées à Sokolov

(“the first applicant”) and Mr Maksim Vladimirovich Sokolov (“the second applicant”), on 20 June 2008.

d'oeuvre, ont manqué à leurs obligations et méconnu les prescriptions du permis de construire ; que la cour d'appel ne pouvait dire que leur responsabilité dans la démolition de la maison des époux Sokol

On 11 June 2020 the Court (Third Section) sitting as a Committee, delivered a decision in a group of cases, which included the current application (see Sokolova and others v.

In the case of Sokolov and Others v.

{ margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } .s653E6C45 { font-family:Arial; font-size:6.67pt; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 40350/22 Sokol

as 22/114   Sokolova Avenue ( Проспект Соколова ) and 22/114-116 Sokolova Lane ( Переулок Соколова )) in Rostov-on-Don.

margin-bottom:0pt } .s5A722CD { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:35.45pt; margin-bottom:0pt } Résolution CM/ResDH(2019)164 Exécution de la décision de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme Nikita Nikolayevich Sokolov

margin-bottom:0pt } .s5A722CD { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:35.45pt; margin-bottom:0pt } Resolution CM/ResDH(2019)164 Execution of the decision of the European Court of Human Rights Nikita Nikolayevich Sokolov

In the case of Sokolov and Others v.

inline-block } .s5044D313 { width:145.19pt; display:inline-block } .s67CC2216 { width:138.53pt; display:inline-block }     THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 68027/10 Nikita Nikolayevich SOKOLOV

s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s8F670191 { font-family:Arial; font-size:12pt; list-style-position:inside }   FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 32967/06 Aleksandr Veniaminovich SOKOLOV

Délégués des Ministres)     Requête n o Affaire Date de la décision 19829/22 Rade BLAGOJEVIĆ 17/05/2023 45132/21 Vesna VUJOVIĆ GRBOVIĆ 04/05/2023 28260/21 Jovana JOVOVIĆ 04/05/2023 40350/22 Sokol

The Government also relied on the Court’s decision in Sokolov   and Others v. Serbia, cited above . The applicant disagreed.

Case Date of the decision 19829/22 Rade BLAGOJEVIĆ 17/05/2023 45132/21 Vesna VUJOVIĆ GRBOVIĆ 04/05/2023 28260/21 Jovana JOVOVIĆ 04/05/2023 40350/22 Sokol SOKOLOVIĆ 01/06/2023 18867/22 Nebojša PAJKIĆ AND

    Mr Sokolov (application no.   61429/16) was represented by Ms   I.   Biryukova, a lawyer practising in Podolsk, Moscow Region.

Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top }   FIFTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 60693/09 Aleksey Igorevich SOKOLOV