CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

403 résultats pour « Jany Thao »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CAA

1re chambre - formation à 3

DCA_21DA02270_20221018

Admin. Appel

18 octobre 2022

18 octobre 2022

Aurélien Gloux-Saliou, rapporteur public, - et les observations de Me Jany Thao représentant, la SCCV Isneauville-route de Neuchâtel et de Me Hélène Detrez-Cambrai substituant Me Jean-François Rouhaud

Source officielle

Page 1 sur 21

Suivant →
CA

Chambre civile 1-5

6969e6c9cdc6046d477dc516

Appel

15 janvier 2026

15 janvier 2026

Localité 13] Représentant : Me Julie GOURION-RICHARD, avocat au barreau de VERSAILLES, vestiaire : 51 - N° du dossier 2251578 Plaidant : Me Olivier FALGA avocat au barreau de Paris Substitué par Me THAO

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0213JUD000497620

Admin. suprême

13 février 2024

13 février 2024

    In July 2006 (that is, prior to his death) Marcel Jann expressed, in written form, his wish that his rights in respect of his asbestos-caused disease be upheld and that his claims and those

Source officielle
CC

soc

ECLI:FR:CCASS:2017:SO11236

Cassation

30 novembre 2017

30 novembre 2017

Saint Dié MEA ; - la plate-forme de Saint Dié H4 ; - l'atelier de mécanique PL de Jarny ; - du service Frais Variables de Jarny ; qu'à partir de février 2008, l'employeur va lui retirer la plate-forme

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-121474

Admin. suprême

30 avril 2013

30 avril 2013

  INDIVIDUAL MEASURES   The government observed that the cases of the applicants had been considered on the merits by the courts of both the first and second instance and it does not seem that

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-7098

Admin. suprême

18 janvier 2001

18 janvier 2001

Jane Smith and Thomas Lee also invoke Article 2 of Protocol No. 1, alleging that the enforcement measures deprived their children or grandchildren of an education.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;FRA;FRE

ECLI:CEDH:001-121439

Admin. suprême

30 avril 2013

30 avril 2013

  individual measures   The government observed that the cases of the applicants had been considered on the merits by the courts of both the first and second instance and it does not seem that

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1122DEC000376007

Admin. suprême

22 novembre 2011

22 novembre 2011

The applicant subsequently informed the Court that she had reached a settlement with the State Attorney’s Office and that she wished to withdraw her application introduced before the Court.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0505DEC003908707

Admin. suprême

5 mai 2009

5 mai 2009

The fact that the applicant was heavily intoxicated at the time of the incident not only made his account of the facts less reliable but also made it more likely that his injuries had been caused by an

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-152652

Admin. suprême

11 février 2015

11 février 2015

margin-left:35.4pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s5A722CD { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:35.45pt; margin-bottom:0pt } Resolution CM/ResDH(2015)13 Execution of the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights Janyr

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0510DEC000230507

Admin. suprême

10 mai 2007

10 mai 2007

It also awarded each of the applicants SKK 50,000 (the equivalent of 1,242 euros at that time) as just satisfaction.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0914DEC005127799

Admin. suprême

14 septembre 2004

14 septembre 2004

The District Court stated that anonymous witness “Jan Novotný” had stated that he had bought at least twenty “envelopes” of heroin from the applicant and that he had recognised the latter from photographs

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0206DEC001163524

Admin. suprême

6 février 2025

6 février 2025

In the event of failure to pay this amount within the above ‑ mentioned three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on it, from the expiry of that period until settlement

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0504DEC004296598

Admin. suprême

4 mai 2000

4 mai 2000

club, that Jana had been mainly made to work in the B. club and that, together with Martina, Jana and Dasa, she had decided to flee to Luxembourg; -   a statement given by Jana K. on 16 November 1995

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0228JUD005127799

Admin. suprême

28 février 2006

28 février 2006

It was recorded that the investigating authorities had reported by telephone that, at the time of the hearing, “Jana Charvátová” could not be found at her home.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1739849-1834450

Admin. suprême

3 août 2006

3 août 2006

Italy (no. 3528/03) Janes Carratù v.

Source officielle
CC

civ3

613723c1cd5801467740dbcd

Cassation

4 décembre 2001

4 décembre 2001

Angel Z..., 2 / de Mme Caridad Y..., épouse Z..., demeurant ensemble "en Jany", 31290 Avignonet Lauragais, défendeurs à la cassation ; La demanderesse invoque, à l'appui de son pourvoi, les

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;HEARINGS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-68110-68578

Admin. suprême

24 mai 2000

24 mai 2000

Sally Chapman and Jane Smith complain under Article 6 (right to a fair trial) that there is no effective access to court to appeal against the planning and enforcement decisions of the authorities.

Source officielle
CA

3e chambre civile

662b43c0fe2545000831488a

Appel

25 avril 2024

25 avril 2024

[S] [B] [Adresse 8] [Adresse 8] [Localité 5] Représenté par Me Jana KRATKA, avocat au barreau de MONTPELLIER S.A.S.U.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0913DEC004776009

Admin. suprême

13 septembre 2016

13 septembre 2016

Jani Mihani, 1,000 euros to cover any and all non-pecuniary damage as well as costs and expenses, plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicant.

Source officielle