COMPLAINTS The applicant originally complained that British social security legislation discriminated against him on grounds of sex, in breach of Article 14 of the Convention, taken in conjunction with both

In both cases the persons concerned had suffered physical injury or damage to health as a result of another’s negligence and sought to obtain compensation.

In a judgment of 5   November 2015 a Chamber of the Court held, unanimously, that there had been a violation of Article   2 both in its substantive and procedural aspects.

On appeal by both parties concerning the compensation awarded, by a judgment of 27   January 2017 the Constitutional Court upheld the finding of a violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention

A.C. instituted parallel proceedings against the applicant challenging the Commission’s decision as supplemented by the Saranda District Court’s decision In 2009, following the parallel progression of both

The complaints of both applicants under Article   5   §   3 of the Convention concerning the excessive length of pre-trial detention were communicated to the Russian Government (“the Government

  The Court has already found both a substantive and a procedural violation of Article 3 of the Convention in respect of the co-defendant Metin Dikme in Dikme v.

Information Note   179 ), the Court had ruled that new remedies that had become available in the domestic law as a result of recent rulings of the Swedish Supreme Court concerning liability to both

Fourthly, both the applicant’s wife and his two children had Greek nationality. They had spent all their lives in Greece and had no close ties with Albania.

Igorovych SPIVAK against Ukraine and Dmytro Yaroslavovych SHANOVSKYY against Ukraine lodged on 23 April 2015 and 27 November 2015 respectively communicated on 22 April 2021 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE Both

Indeed, his need for absolute emotional security was likely to increase as he grew up as he became aware that both his mother and father had been heavy drug abusers and that he had been exposed to serious

  The applicants both arrived in Belgium at Brussels-National airport on flights from Freetown (Sierra Leone), Mr Riad on 27 December 2002 and Mr Idiab on 24 December of the same year.

  The applicant was convicted by a unanimous verdict on both counts of indecent assault.   He was sentenced to one 15-month and one 12-month custodial sentence, to run consecutively.

Relying on Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, both applicants complain of: (i) the elements on the basis of which they have been declared socially dangerous, and (ii) the lack of correlation between the

    Both parties undertake that they will not request [referral] of the case to the Grand Chamber ... pursuant to Article 43 § 1 of the Convention. 6.

They also submitted a psychological study which reported that segregated education produced emotional and psychological harm in Roma children, both in terms of self-esteem and development of their identity

prosecution authorities;   Recalling that the possibility for Ms Ismayilova to continue her work as a journalist without harassment or hindrance is key, and that this requires further progress with both

Even assuming that he had participated in the parliamentary debate in an advisory capacity he had not carried out both advisory and judicial functions in the same case.

Two such reports were prepared and both indicated that there had been serious omissions in handling the birth.