CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-248547
13 janvier 2026
them from participating in the protests and thus from expressing their political views; and under Article 13 of the Convention that there are no effective remedies for these complaints at the domestic level
Page 94 sur 16396
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1211JUD001318620
11 décembre 2025
applicants under Article 3 of the Convention admissible (and the complaints of the other two applicants under that Article inadmissible); ( c ) found, unanimously, a violation of the procedural limb of
ECLI:CEDH:001-247821
26 novembre 2025
Courts of two instances found for the applicant and ordered the local police service centre to renew the registration of the applicant’s vehicle.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1216JUD004275823
16 décembre 2025
Furthermore, based on interviews that child welfare officers had conducted with the children, the court also found that both children objected to being returned to Russia but that only the older child
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1204JUD003834223
4 décembre 2025
In that connection, the experts found that placing a patient who had experienced one isolated seizure under routine supervision in a neurology ward was the standard level of care.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1204JUD000549717
By a letter of 3 April 2013 the applicant NGO informed the Ministry of Defence that, within the framework of the project “Safe Soldier for a Safe Armenia” it intended to monitor the level
ECLI:CEDH:001-247603
20 novembre 2025
The applicant’s judicial review complaint was rejected, as the courts found that it had previously promoted homosexuality among minors (final decision of 7 August 2023 by the Supreme Court) (see
ECLI:CEDH:001-250000
7 avril 2026
Following remittal of the case by the Supreme Court to the appellate court concerning the applicants’ acquittal on the robbery charge and certain reclassification issues, the appellate court found both
ECLI:CEDH:001-249570
13 mars 2026
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
ECLI:CEDH:001-249359
23 février 2026
ECLI:CEDH:001-250340
28 avril 2026
Arial; font-weight:bold } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } Published on 18 May 2026 FOURTH
ECLI:CEDH:001-250038
9 avril 2026
On 20 March 2025 the Constitutional Court rejected the applicants’ appeal as a “fourth-instance” complaint.
ECLI:CEDH:001-250187
20 avril 2026
ECLI:CEDH:001-250561
13 mai 2026
ECLI:CEDH:001-250353
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;FRA;FRE
V, Brusc/Belgique
ECLI:CEDH:001-250086
17 avril 2026
ECLI:CEDH:001-250471
6 mai 2026
Appeal upheld the first-instance court’s decision, noting, inter alia , that although the Code of Administrative Offences did not define the concept of a public space, that definition was found
ECLI:CEDH:001-250462
5 mai 2026
Demande de renseignements Le Gouvernement est invité à fournir les données statistiques nationales actualisées concernant les procédures de « pre-dissesto » et de « dissesto
ECLI:CEDH:001-250338
27 avril 2026
.sF74FAE9B { font-family:Arial; font-size:9.5pt } .s9252AC04 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } Published on 18 May 2026 FOURTH
ECLI:CEDH:001-249681
18 mars 2026