CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

30 676 résultats pour « Bothner »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-218714

Admin. suprême

4 juillet 2022

4 juillet 2022

The applicants participated in both civil and the ensuing enforcement proceedings as interested third parties on the side of the municipality because the road in question enabled them to access their properties

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-249118

Admin. suprême

13 février 2026

13 février 2026

As of 12 June 2025, both requests remained unexamined.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-208213

Admin. suprême

27 janvier 2021

27 janvier 2021

They argue that both the required declaration and the structure of the birth certificate with the pre-printed section constitute a violation of their right to freedom of religion.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-192058

Admin. suprême

1 mars 2019

1 mars 2019

the present case, as proscribed by Article   7 of the Convention (see, in particular, the judgments of the Court of First Instance, Prvi osnovni sud , and the Court of Appeal, Apelacioni sud , both

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-4120

Admin. suprême

9 novembre 2004

9 novembre 2004

lodged the protest was also a member of the Presidium of the Regional Court which examined the protest, this was incompatible with the required “subjective impartiality” of a judge, who could not be both

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-172646

Admin. suprême

8 mars 2017

8 mars 2017

Both the prosecution and the applicant have filed an appeal, which is currently still pending. The applicant´s asylum procedure is still pending before the Deputy Minister of Security and Justice.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-7130

Admin. suprême

21 septembre 2000

21 septembre 2000

In 1995 an appellate court divided the proceedings into two separate sets, both of which are still pending.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-176152

Admin. suprême

12 juillet 2017

12 juillet 2017

She was found responsible for disseminating unverified information in both sets of proceedings (final decisions: Krasnodar Regional Court, 25 July 2013, and Lazarevskiy District Court, 24 October 2013)

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-238488

Admin. suprême

12 novembre 2024

12 novembre 2024

Relying on Article 3 of the Convention under its both heads, substantive and procedural, the applicant complains that he was unlawfully assaulted by a police officer and subjected to inhuman and degrading

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-215569

Admin. suprême

13 janvier 2022

13 janvier 2022

Both courts refused to make in the applicant’s favour, and against the Attorney General, an order regarding the costs of the case.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-174125

Admin. suprême

11 mai 2017

11 mai 2017

It therefore mitigated both his sentence and the sentence imposed on the first applicant.

Source officielle
TA

Juge unique (8)

DTA_2503973_20250722

Administratif

22 juillet 2025

22 juillet 2025

BOHN

Source officielle
TA

Tribunal Administratif de Strasbourg

DTA_2305461_20230828

Administratif

28 août 2023

28 août 2023

Bohn, greffier d'audience, M. Rees a lu son rapport et entendu : - les observations de Me A, pour M.

Source officielle
TA

Tribunal Administratif de Strasbourg

ORTA_2506038_20250730

Administratif

30 juillet 2025

30 juillet 2025

BOHN

Source officielle
TA

Tribunal Administratif de Strasbourg

ORTA_2302479_20250328

Administratif

28 mars 2025

28 mars 2025

BOHN

Source officielle
TA

Tribunal Administratif de Strasbourg

ORTA_2302981_20250317

Administratif

17 mars 2025

17 mars 2025

Bohn

Source officielle
TA

Tribunal Administratif de Strasbourg

ORTA_2205798_20250219

Administratif

19 février 2025

19 février 2025

Bohn

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-4533

Admin. suprême

29 janvier 2004

29 janvier 2004

He was sentenced to 7   years’ imprisonment, whilst the other co-accused, both of Russian origin, received lighter sentences.

Source officielle
TA

Tribunal Administratif de Strasbourg

ORTA_2305667_20250306

Administratif

6 mars 2025

6 mars 2025

Bohn

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-182964

Admin. suprême

16 avril 2018

16 avril 2018

applicants’ case, including but not limited to the minutes of all the hearings, documentary evidence against the applicants and the reasoned judgments, the applicants’ and their lawyers’ written submissions both

Source officielle

Page 92 sur 1534

← PrécédentSuivant →