The child, aged 11, had got to know the applicant, who at the time was a law student, through his sister.

ground of appeal on points of law for want of clarity owing to a failure to present the facts of the case as established by the court of appeal: admissible   The applicants are the parents of a child

  The refusal to allow the child access to Netherlands territory The Netherlands authorities were in principle entitled to refuse the child access to the country provided that such refusal was not

circumstances had changed, with the result that the child’s return to the United Kingdom might now expose her to harm, within the meaning of the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child

After the mother’s death, the two children concerned by the adoption procedure were placed with professional childcare assistants and the third child (born in June 2012), was placed in special care as

B..., représenté par Me Chelly, demande au tribunal : 1°) d’annuler l’arrêté du 15 janvier 2024 par lequel le préfet du Gard l’a obligée à quitter le territoire français sans délai, et a fixé le pays

Ont été entendus au cours de l'audience publique : - le rapport de Mme Achour, - les observations de Me Chelly, représentant M. A, assisté de M.

  The child, aged 11, had got to know the applicant, who at the time was a law student, through his sister.

(“third-child allowance”).

under Articles 6 and 14 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention, in particular, that he had suffered gender-based discrimination as a result of the provisions of the 1947 Child

  By a judgment of 21 November 2001 the applicant’s wife was awarded sole custody of the child, while the applicant was given the use of the matrimonial home.

concerned a violation of the applicant’s right of access to a court in that he was denied the possibility of obtaining a judicial determination of his claim that he was not the biological father of a child

They were survived by their only child R.S. and the applicant who is the only child of R.S. Neither had any surviving parent; Mr S. had one sibling, his sister Mrs W.

The applicant continued receiving child support benefit and unemployment benefit from Latvia. While in Norway she did not work and was supported by her husband. 4.

The child was at that time in the care of the social welfare department, which was responsible for arranging the contact sessions, in a context of heightened conflict between the child’s parents.

The relevant provisions of domestic law gave rise to a difference in treatment for a child born outside marriage before the legally prescribed cut-off date of 01/07/1949, as compared with a child born

  The Juvenile Court ordered that Rita's parents were not to be treated as representing the child, and therefore had her own solicitors and a guardian ad litem to protect her interests.

  Case description:   - The case concerned the medical treatment of a child (the applicant together with her father) in March 1998 in a public hospital, in particular conducting tests on the

of the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction.

  In addition, the Child Protection Act of 2000 created a State Child Protection Agency and regional Social Care Offices, which are competent, inter alia, to take protection measures in respect of