CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 21 décembre 2020

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s5FFF0A75 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:7pt } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .sD37F5C3B { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:0pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:7pt } .s8BF518A7 { width:102.98%; border-collapse:collapse } .sA648FB07 { width:7.3%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s6A6CC9F6 { width:19.88%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s9F64AD74 { width:14.62%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s36480ED { width:43.22%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sFA29F848 { width:14.98%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s6A24725C { width:7.3%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s7DF474E7 { width:19.88%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s5FA3785C { width:14.62%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sF634E604 { width:43.22%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2636E1DF { width:14.98%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s9252AC04 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } Communicated on 21 December 2020 Published on 18 January 2021   FIFTH SECTION Application no. 38692/16 Jonche BLAZHESKI and Vide BLAZHESKA against North Macedonia lodged on 29 June 2016 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The applicants are parents of three minor children. All children and Mr   Blazheski (the applicant father) have the nationality of the respondent State. In 2009, following the birth of their third child, Ms Blazheska, the applicant mother and spouse of the applicant father, obtained a social allowance aimed at supporting families with three or more children (“third-child allowance”). The payment of this allowance was discontinued in 2012 when the competent administrative authority discovered that she had not been a national of the respondent State, which was a statutory requirement for obtaining the allowance in question. Two levels of administrative courts dismissed the applicants’ appeals and confirmed the discontinuation of the payment. It appears that the aforesaid circumstances regarding the applicants did not fall under any statutory exception that would have provided Mr   Blazheski, instead of Ms Blazheska, with the possibility of claiming the allowance in question.     QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES Has the respondent State discharged its positive obligation under Article   5 of Protocol No. 7 to provide for a satisfactory legal framework under which the applicants, as spouses, would enjoy equal rights and responsibilities in respect of their children? In particular, has the applicable legal framework provided Mr Blazheski with the same rights as Ms   Blazheska with regard to the entitlement to a third-child allowance? If not, was the difference in treatment between the applicants, as spouses, necessary in the interests of their children, within the meaning of Article 5 of Protocol No. 7?   APPENDIX   No. Applicant’s Name Birth year Nationality Place of residence 1 Jonche BLAZHESKI 1962 Macedonian/citizen of the Republic of North Macedonia Drugovo 2 Vide BLAZHESKA 1970 Albanian/ Macedonian/ citizen of the Republic of North Macedonia Drugovo