SUBJECT MATTER The applications concern complaints raised under Article 3 of the Convention relating to inadequate conditions of detention during transport which are the subject of well-established case

    The applicants complained principally of the inadequate conditions of detention during their transport. They relied on Article 3 of the Convention. 8.

As it was later noted during the applicant’s trial, the time was indicated incorrectly (see below).

    The applicants complained principally of the inadequate conditions of detention during their transport. They relied on Article 3 of the Convention. 8.

court hearings and in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport;   Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - by van between the remand prison and the Arkhangelsk

transport and detention in a cage during court hearings.

    The applicants complained principally of the inadequate conditions of detention during their transport.

En l'espèce, il est constant que la société CHAMPAGNE [V] a conclu avec l'entreprise générale DUCOIN un marché de travaux et que la SAS DUCOIN a sous-traité les travaux de peinture à la SARL [K] PERE &

    The applicants complained principally of the inadequate conditions of detention during their transport. They relied on Article 3 of the Convention. 8.

(b)     in a metal cage during the appeal hearing?   2.

the holy for all Muslims month of Ramadan (August), during which I, as a faithful Muslim, must not eat and drink during the daylight hours.” 11.

    The applicants complained principally of the inadequate conditions of detention during their transport. They relied on Article 3 of the Convention. 8.

  APPENDIX – STATEMENT OF FACTS List of applications raising complaints under Article 3 of the Convention (inadequate conditions of detention during transport) No. Application no.

Turkey 26/11/2019 Lack of hearing during the detention review Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Lack of reasonable suspicion 114 64978/19 Oyar v.

Duringer Par ailleurs, M.

Russia [GC], nos. 32541/08 and 43441/08, ECHR 2014 (extracts), as regards placement in a metal cage during court hearings; Blokhin v.

The Court refers to the principles established in its case‑law regarding cramped and defective conditions during the transit of prisoners (see Tomov and Others v.

#Recurs – Dumping – Regulamentul de punere în aplicare (UE) 2017/804 – Importuri de anumite țevi și tuburi fără sudură originare din China – Taxă antidumping definitivă – Regulamentul (UE) 2016/1036 –

SUBJECT MATTER The applications concern complaints raised under Article 3 of the Convention relating to inadequate conditions of detention during transport which are the subject of well-established case