1°) d'ordonner l'expulsion de M. et Mme A C, M. et Mme G C, M. et Mme B D, M. et Mme E et tous autres occupants sans droit ni titre de la parcelle cadastrée AM n°67 sise 229 avenue de l'épinette à Libourne

Sur le pourvoi formé par le Comptoir pessacais du pneu, société anonyme, dont le siège est ..., en cassation d'une ordonnance de référé rendue le 15 mai 1997 par le conseil de prud'hommes de Libourne

Gérard Y..., 2 / Mme Sylvie X..., épouse Y..., demeurant ensemble ..., en cassation d'un jugement rendu le 15 novembre 2000 par le juge du tribunal d'instance de Libourne, délégué dans les fonctions

C B doit être regardé comme demandant au tribunal d'annuler l'arrêté du 26 avril 2023 par lequel le maire de Libourne a accordé à Mme A un permis pour la construction d'une maison individuelle sur le terrain

Adresse 3], décédé, 2/ à Mme [J] [H], domiciliée [Adresse 3], 3°/ à la société Cabinet Quintric et associés, société à responsabilité limitée, dont le siège est [Adresse 4], 4°/ à la société Liberty

société commerciale étrangère, dont le siège est [Adresse 1], [Localité 14], 4°/ la société Aig Europe, société anonyme, dont le siège est [Adresse 20], [Adresse 2], [Localité 15], 5°/ la société Liberty

Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1-e - Persons of unsound mind)

    In view of the length of the applicant’s detention and the fact that he continues to be deprived of his liberty in the alleged breach of Article 5   §   3 of the Convention, the

The court held, without giving any further details, that there were grounds to believe that, if left at liberty, the applicant would seek to evade investigation and trial, and obstruct the establishment

    Everyone has the right to liberty and security of person.

Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Reasonableness of pre-trial detention)

Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Reasonableness of pre-trial detention)

In its decision of 16 June 2011, that court insisted that the interest of securing the applicant’s availability for justice outweighed his right to personal liberty and that the continued detention could

Damages on the basis of a loss of liberty were therefore appropriate. 14 .

Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Reasonableness of pre-trial detention)

    Relevant international materials concerning the deprivation of liberty of juveniles are set out in the cases of Nart v. Turkey (no.

Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Length of pre-trial detention)

    Everyone who is deprived of his liberty by arrest or detention shall be entitled to take proceedings by which the lawfulness of his detention shall be decided speedily by a court and his

Also, there comes a moment when the existence of reasonable suspicion is no longer enough and other grounds must be given by the judicial authorities to justify the deprivation of liberty (see Stettner