transport and in respect of placement in the metal cages during hearings.

transport and in respect of placement in a metal cage during court hearings,   Art. 3 - use of metal cages and/or other security arrangements in courtrooms - detention in a metal cage during the

transport and in respect of placement in a metal cage during court hearings.

According to the applicant, the police had explicitly requested the lawyer’s presence and assistance during the interrogation.

    The applicants complained principally of the inadequate conditions of detention during their transport. They relied on Article 3 of the Convention. 8.

  APPENDIX – STATEMENT OF FACTS List of applications raising complaints under Article 3 of the Convention (inadequate conditions of detention during transport) No. Application no.

(b)     during the appeal hearing (see paragraph 7 of the Facts section)?   2.

SUBJECT MATTER The applications concern complaints raised under Article 3 of the Convention relating to inadequate conditions of detention during transport which are the subject of well-established case

summer; lack of fresh air) 27/12/2017 06/04/2017 27/12/2017 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of placement in a metal cage during court hearings.

  Zheleznodorozhniy and Sverdlovskiy District Courts of Krasnoyarsk   06/02/2020 19/04/2021 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of placement in a metal cage during

  APPENDIX – STATEMENT OF FACTS List of applications raising complaints under Article 3 of the Convention (inadequate conditions of detention during transport) No. Application no.

of detention during transport.

SUBJECT MATTER The applications concern complaints raised under Article 3 of the Convention relating to inadequate conditions of detention during transport which are the subject of well-established case

The Court refers to the principles established in its case‑law regarding cramped and defective conditions during the transit of prisoners (see Tomov and Others v.

He was questioned for about five hours, during which he initially denied any involvement in the crime and subsequently confessed to it.

The Court refers to the principles established in its case‑law regarding cramped and defective conditions during the transit of prisoners (see Tomov and Others v.

SUBJECT MATTER The applications concern complaints raised under Article 3 of the Convention relating to inadequate conditions of detention during transport which are the subject of well-established case

Le 5 mai 2017, La SCEA Château Richelieu a réglé à la société Ducoin le solde des sommes dues au titre de son marché.

Russia [GC], nos. 32541/08 and 43441/08, ECHR 2014 (extracts), as regards placement in a metal cage during court hearings, and Gorlov and Others v. Russia , nos.

exchange either in the course of the trial or during court breaks, microphones installed above the table of the counsel, which remained “on” during court breaks)   (judgment of the Supreme Court