width:204.97pt; display:inline-block }   FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 2992/09 Rinat Talgatovich GADELSHIN against Russia The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 15 April

Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } Resolution ResDH(2004)67 concerning the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 22 April

Poland (no. 20071/07, §§ 105-117, 17 April 2012), and Horych v. Poland (no. 13621/08, §§ 44-56, 17 April 2012).

On 1 April 1992 two members of the Croatian Army entered into the house of the applicants’ respective father and grandfather, M.B., and stabbed him several times with a knife which caused him grievous

margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .sA1D3DA2E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } Resolution ResDH(2001)49 concerning the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 28 April

margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .sA1D3DA2E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } Resolution ResDH(2003)78 concerning the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 12 April

the opinion that there had been a violation of Article 6, paragraph 1 (art. 6-1), of the Convention;        Whereas, at the 534th meeting of the Ministers' Deputies held on 7 April

before the European Court of Human Rights in pursuance of Article 48 (art. 48) of the Convention;        Whereas in her application, declared admissible by the Commission on 1 April

On 15 April 2021 the applicant’s representative requested the Court to extend the time allowed to submit the information in question.

On 29 April 2022 the Supreme Court gave an order finding that the conditions for surrender had been met.

In April 2001 his passport was returned to him by the police.

In this connection the applicant company also complains that the decision ordering it to pay the costs for the hearing held on 19 April 2004 violated its rights guaranteed by Article 1 of Protocol No.

On 2 April 2024, the Turkish Constitutional Court rejected the applicant’s individual application as inadmissible.

On 12 April 2001 the Court of Cassation quashed the judgment of 8 June 2000. On 21 April 2005 the court partially granted the applicant’s request.

The applicant’s representative received that letter on 26 April 2023. However, no response has followed.

On 5 April 2023 a higher-court judge upheld that decision.

N° Portalis DB3S-W-B7G-WN5B N° de Minute : 24/00023 Monsieur [L] [Y] [Adresse 3] [Localité 6] représenté par Me Stéphanie ABIDOS, avocat au barreau de PARIS, vestiaire : C1936 DEMANDEUR C/ SASU APRIL

In April   2005 the authorities seized his car’s registration documents and plates since it appeared on the police vehicle search database.

On 5   May 2000, after having found that the decision of 2   April 1998 was incomplete, the Tirana Court of Appeal issued a new decision integrating the decision of 2 April 1998 (final decisions