CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

47 968 résultats pour « Ducuing »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0216JUD006976212

Admin. suprême

16 février 2021

16 février 2021

During the photographic identification procedure, K.Ş. was represented by his lawyer. 7.

Source officielle

Page 77 sur 2399

← PrécédentSuivant →

Annonces BODACC41 résultats

Journal officiel
Radiations

DUCUING, Alain

SIREN 513070961Greffe du Tribunal de Commerce de Périgueux

22/03/2026

Voir →

Créations

De HAAN DUCUING, Melvyn

SIREN 988921110Greffe du Tribunal de Commerce de Tarbes

18/07/2025

Voir →

Radiations

DUCUING, Jordy Mickaël Serge

SIREN 901513671Greffe du Tribunal de Commerce de Tarbes

12/02/2025

Voir →

Radiations

DUCUING, Clément, Pierre

SIREN 949268874Greffe du Tribunal de Commerce de Bordeaux

18/12/2024

Voir →

Créations

DUCUING, Paolo Thomas

SIREN 937714129Greffe du Tribunal de Commerce de Toulouse

04/12/2024

Voir →

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0716JUD002057912

Admin. suprême

16 juillet 2015

16 juillet 2015

    A.H. did not mention that fact during his first questioning.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0204JUD008155312

Admin. suprême

4 février 2016

4 février 2016

22 June 2012 or during the additional commission forensic examination of 23 August 2012.” 38.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0403JUD002131812

Admin. suprême

3 avril 2018

3 avril 2018

records indicated that the block had accommodated between 94 and 110 inmates per day during those periods.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-175357

Admin. suprême

13 juin 2017

13 juin 2017

In particular, has there been a breach of Article 6 § 3 (c) of the Convention, in conjunction with Article 6 § 1, as a result of the lack of legal assistance available to the applicant during his detention

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-145169

Admin. suprême

28 mai 2014

28 mai 2014

During this time the case was heard three times by the Supreme Court of Justice of the self-proclaimed Republic of Transdniestria, of which two times a rehearing by the first-instance court was ordered

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-183735

Admin. suprême

15 mai 2018

15 mai 2018

July 2009 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the alleged unfairness of the criminal proceedings due to the systemic restriction imposed on the applicant’s right of access to a lawyer during

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-192792

Admin. suprême

29 mars 2019

29 mars 2019

3891/19 Marcel-Dan CÎNȚA against Romania lodged on 9 January 2019 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns restrictions on the applicant’s right of contact with his four-year-old daughter during

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-7252

Admin. suprême

16 octobre 2012

16 octobre 2012

Pursuant to complaints by neighbouring residents that the noise disturbed their rest during the night, the applicant was informed that if he did not reduce the volume of the bell between 11   p.m.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-4328

Admin. suprême

30 septembre 2004

30 septembre 2004

He maintains that during the criminal proceedings his lawyer did not represent him for a period of over two months.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-231290

Admin. suprême

1 février 2024

1 février 2024

It concerned the applicant’s detention in Varna Prison during the period between 1 June 2007 and 23 February 2018.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-184718

Admin. suprême

25 juin 2018

25 juin 2018

What were the arrangements for the applicants’ consultations with their lawyer during the trial? Were the applicants able to speak to their lawyers in private during the hearing?

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-233367

Admin. suprême

26 mars 2024

26 mars 2024

During that time, the applicant met with certain G.Ć. on two occasions, who had been equipped with a recording device and provided the applicant with counterfeit banknotes by the police.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-238019

Admin. suprême

14 octobre 2024

14 octobre 2024

Yuriyovych GAZIN against Ukraine lodged on 10 August 2019 communicated on 14 October 2024 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns an alleged act of medical malpractice, which took place during

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-229643

Admin. suprême

21 novembre 2023

21 novembre 2023

November 2023 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns an administrative court’s rejection as belated of the applicant’s administrative-law action for damages in respect of a work accident during

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-209231

Admin. suprême

19 mars 2021

19 mars 2021

During the criminal proceedings, he was suspended from his position of a judge. Since that position was incompatible with most other paid activities, he could not earn his living.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-13316

Admin. suprême

31 mai 2021

31 mai 2021

France (communicated case) - 23624/20   Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6-1 Fair hearing Criminal conviction for refusal to disclose the security code to unlock a mobile phone during police

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-217848

Admin. suprême

9 mai 2022

9 mai 2022

The application concerns both the alleged incompatibility of detention, between 19 September 2019 and 16 March 2021, with the applicant’s psychiatric disorder; and the lack of adequate assistance during

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1009JUD003787304

Admin. suprême

9 octobre 2014

9 octobre 2014

During the labour the doctors performed an episiotomy (incision). The child was diagnosed with light asphyxia.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0511JUD000741509

Admin. suprême

11 mai 2021

11 mai 2021

According to the lawyer, she had been present during the applicant’s examination by the expert on 13 October 2006 and had heard the applicant complaining about bleeding during defecation.

Source officielle