CEDHCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;CLIN;ENG — 31 mai 2021
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:002-13316
- Date
- 31 mai 2021
- Publication
- 31 mai 2021
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleAffaire communiquée
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sD4B5322E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA241FE93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:18pt; text-align:justify; page-break-after:avoid; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .s4DDA3AA3 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; font-style:italic } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s8F2B0B1B { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:12pt } .s97EB40D9 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:14pt; page-break-after:avoid } .s65B66A85 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s5F48796F { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .s8B6C6D43 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; border-bottom:1pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .sDF790F1E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } Information Note on the Court’s case-law 252 June 2021 Minteh v. France (communicated case) - 23624/20   Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6-1 Fair hearing Criminal conviction for refusal to disclose the security code to unlock a mobile phone during police custody: communicated Article 8 Article 8-1 Respect for correspondence Respect for private life Criminal conviction for refusal to disclose the security code to unlock a mobile phone during police custody: communicated It is an offence under the French criminal code “for an individual having knowledge of the decryption procedure for access to an encrypted device that could have been used to prepare, facilitate or commit a serious offence, to refuse to disclose that procedure to the judicial authorities or to use it when so directed by the authorities …” (Article 434-15-2). Having been convicted on the basis of that provision for refusing to disclose to the police the code to unlock his mobile phone while he was in police custody, the applicant complains of a breach of his right to remain silent and not to incriminate himself, together with a breach of his right to respect for his private life and for his correspondence. Case communicated under Article 6 §   1 and Article 8 of the Convention.   © Council of Europe/European Court of Human Rights This summary by the Registry does not bind the Court. Click here for the Case-Law Information NotesCitations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
- Date
- 31 mai 2021
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:002-13316
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel