CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
Chambre civile 1-2
69df1ccdcdc6046d47475bfb
14 avril 2026
le 07 Mars 2025 par le Juge des contentieux de la protection de [Localité 1] N° Chambre : N° Section : N° RG : Expéditions exécutoires Copies délivrées le : 14/04/2026 à : Me Elisa GUEILHERS
Page 75 sur 292
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-157357
28 août 2015
This time he denied his guilt (record of 20 September 2006). B. The applicant’s injuries 13.
ECLI:CEDH:001-184675
22 juin 2018
The court noted that T.D. had initially given consistent statements about his guilt for M.K.’s murder but had later withdrawn them claiming that he had been pressured to incriminate himself by police officers
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1016DEC000680903
16 octobre 2007
The applicant complained that the prosecutor should not have made a statement as to his guilt before a final judgment had been delivered by a court. 3.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:1018DEC002121393
18 octobre 1994
She also alleges a violation of Article 6 para. 2 of the Convention in that she was required to prove her innocence, rather than the State being required to prove her guilt.
16e chambre
60347a9920760468939cf81a
1 décembre 2016
rendu le 06 Avril 2016 par le Juge de l'exécution du TGI de VERSAILLES N° Chambre : / N° Section : N° RG : 15/00036 Expéditions exécutoires Expéditions Copies délivrées le : à : SCP GUEILHERS
13e chambre
615e0d54c25a97f0381f4cdf
18 septembre 2014
les parties et les conditions étaient pour l'essentiel inchangées, la signature d'un nouveau contrat étant proposée dans un but d'harmonisation, à la suite de l'intégration de Lynx optique dans la guilde
Cour d'Appel
6253cd92bd3db21cbdd93b41
: Jugement rendu le 06 Avril 2016 par le Juge de l'exécution du TGI de VERSAILLES No Chambre : / No Section : No RG : 15/00036 Expéditions exécutoires Expéditions Copies délivrées le : à : SCP GUEILHERS
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0207DEC004374898
7 février 2006
The court was of the opinion that the applicant’s detention was justified by the strong probability of his guilt, the necessity to obtain further evidence and the risk of pressure being brought to bear
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0521DEC002708395
21 mai 1997
judgment of 19 September 1988 the Court of Appeal of The Hague quashed the Regional Court's judgment of 23 November 1984, convicted the applicant of tax evasion and imposed a fine of 200.000 Dutch guilders
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0906DEC001413202
6 septembre 2005
He further complained, invoking Article 6 § 2 that the standard of proof considered adequate to establish his guilt in this matter fell short of the standard which is necessary to overcome the presumption
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0326DEC003608202
26 mars 2009
s guilt.
CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0704REP001534689
4 juillet 1994
On the same day, the second applicant also presented a request for reimbursement of the legal and subsidiary costs provisionally estimated at 486.394,60 Dutch guilders - including 470.000 guilders
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:1030REP002706195
30 octobre 1997
seriousness of the minor offence and, in particular, the way and the circumstances in which it was committed, its consequences, the degree of guilt
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0416JUD001889508
16 avril 2019
It also relied on the statements of a number of other witnesses who had testified regarding various aspects of the case other than the applicant’s guilt.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1204JUD005591209
4 décembre 2018
in her denying her guilt.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1216JUD003357904
16 décembre 2010
As regards admissions of guilt, Article 73 of the CCP requires verification of a suspect's statements.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1116JUD000092605
16 novembre 2010
The proposed version of Article 350 of the CCP stated that the Assize Court should give reasons for its decision as to guilt, but was not required to address the parties’ submissions. 36.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0217JUD005627100
17 février 2005
He observed that there was strong evidence of guilt against the applicant, who was in possession of documents showing that he was in contact with persons connected to drug-trafficking.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0920JUD000092608
20 septembre 2016
As a rule, it would be questionable whether a court should be allowed to remedy defects or supplement lacunae in the public authority’s effort to prove the defendant’s guilt.