E.M. and T.A. against Norway lodged on 31 July 2017 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns proceedings in which the domestic authorities refused to lift the care order for the applicants’ child

A PAYER DES ARRERAGES DE LA PENSION ALIMENTAIRE QU'IL AVAIT ETE CONDAMNE PAR LEDIT JUGEMENT A LUI VERSER TANT POUR ELLE-MEME QUE POUR L'ENFANT ISSU DU MARIAGE ET DONT ELLE AVAIT LA GARDE ; QUE CHELLY

B A demande au juge des référés d'annuler la décision du 24 novembre 2023 par laquelle l'ambassadeur de France au Chili a rejeté sa demande tendant au maintien de l'aide à l'accès à la Caisse des français

Vu la procédure suivante : Par une requête, enregistrée le 8 octobre 2021, les sociétés Bio-Rad, Bio-Rad France et Bio-Rad Services France, représentées par Me Child, demande au tribunal : 1°) d'annuler

As an adoptive child, S. will have nothing to fear from [the applicant].

at least seven days (case of A.M. and Others ); (ii)     a seven-month-old child, for at least seven days (case of R.M. and Others ); (iii)     a two-year-old child, for a ten-day period

In February 2004 his mother called a child protection authority to report that he was being abused by her husband, the boy’s father.

at least seven days (case of A.M. and Others ); (ii)     a seven-month-old child, for at least seven days (case of R.M. and Others ); (iii)     a two-year-old child, for a ten-day period

at least seven days (case of A.M. and Others ); (ii)     a seven-month-old child, for at least seven days (case of R.M. and Others ); (iii)     a two-year-old child, for a ten-day period

at least seven days (case of A.M. and Others ); (ii)     a seven-month-old child, for at least seven days (case of R.M. and Others ); (iii)     a two-year-old child, for a ten-day period

at least seven days (case of A.M. and Others ); (ii)     a seven-month-old child, for at least seven days (case of R.M. and Others ); (iii)     a two-year-old child, for a ten-day period

Having examined the child, the doctor in attendance observed that the child had no health problems, but he agreed with those concerned that for the purpose of implementing the interim measure, mother and

    On 15 December 2011 the Municipal Child Protection Department (“child protection authority”) approved a contact schedule, which was reviewed at the applicant’s request in 2012 and 2013.

        On 15 November 1993, the oldest child was heard in connection with the requested change of guardianship and the access arrangement.

Section 12 “(1) An employed or self-employed mother has the right to maternity leave during her pregnancy and while caring for her child after childbirth, and may remain on such leave until the child is

allowances or sued Ms Z. for her failure to pay child maintenance.

The applicant was also allowed to take the child outside his place of residence accompanied by his mother.

return of the child. ...