CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 17 juin 2019

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sA6BC7FA7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } Communicated on 17 June 2019   SECOND SECTION Application no. 56271/17 E.M. and T.A. against Norway lodged on 31 July 2017 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns proceedings in which the domestic authorities refused to lift the care order for the applicants’ child and awarded the applicants contact rights of four hours, three times yearly. Under Article 8 of the Convention, the applicants submit that the above entailed a disproportionate interference with their right to respect for family life. QUESTION tO THE PARTIES Did the proceedings complained of, which concerned the applicants’ claim to have the care order for their child lifted and contact rights awarded, entail a disproportionate interference with their right to respect for family life under Article 8 of the Convention? (See, for example, K. and T. v.   Finland [GC], no. 25702/94, ECHR 2001 ‑ VII.)