CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1988:1209DEC001346287
9 décembre 1988
SCHERMERS H. DANELIUS J.
Page 73 sur 462
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0412DEC002556094
12 avril 1996
SCHERMERS F.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0906DEC002217593
6 septembre 1995
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:1130DEC002134193
30 novembre 1994
SCHERMERS Mme G.H. THUNE MM.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1986:0512DEC001098384
12 mai 1986
SCHERMERS H. DANELIUS G.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0401DEC001658190
1 avril 1992
SCHERMERS H. DANELIUS Mme G.H. THUNE MM. F.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:1202DEC001735590
2 décembre 1992
SCHERMERS H.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-2649
21 juin 2007
The compelling grounds in the general interest, it appeared, were simply the need to preserve the financial equilibrium of the health branch of the mandatory social security scheme.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:1020DEC001951392
20 octobre 1992
ECLI:CEDH:002-2827
15 mars 2007
compensation actually obtained or the compensation which could be obtained through a normal use of the procedures available to the applicants at the relevant time, including the bonds compensation scheme
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0531DEC006600509
31 mai 2011
Article, this time taken together with Article 14 of the Convention, and under Article 1 of Protocol No. 12 that the refusal to register her spouse as co-insured under the medical insurance scheme
ECLI:CEDH:002-740
4 novembre 2010
1 to create a welfare or pension scheme, if a State did decide to do so the legislation had to be regarded as generating a proprietary interest falling within the ambit of Article 1 of Protocol
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0505DEC001448888
5 mai 1993
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:1018DEC002409794
18 octobre 1995
SCHERMERS F. MARTINEZ L.
Cour d'Appel
6253cc14bd3db21cbdd8f0f6
9 février 2012
le 03 Novembre 1977 à NANCY (54000) ... ... 34000 MONTPELLIER représentée par la SCP Gilles ARGELLIES ET Fabien WATREMET, avocats au barreau de MONTPELLIER, avocat postulant et par Me Alain SCHEUER
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1990:0309DEC001521589
9 mars 1990
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-221455
11 novembre 2022
A lot of people, in particular from Bitola, lost their deposits in what was later established by the judicial authorities to constitute a “pyramid savings scheme”.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0513DEC001647890
13 mai 1992
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1988:1209DEC001346487
ECLI:CEDH:002-7008
30 mai 2000
The applicant company obtained an order from the administrative court quashing the resolution to take possession on the ground that the scheme was unlawful and not in the public interest.