judgments of the Court;   DECLARES that this continued refusal by Turkey is in flagrant conflict with its international obligations, both as a High Contracting Party to the Convention and as a member State

Respondent State urged to take individual measures

Respondent State urged to take individual measures

the root causes of these violations, in particular the misuse of the criminal law and retaliatory prosecutions, which could include the implementation of the relevant recommendations of the Group of States

flaws of the criminal proceedings engaged against him and notwithstanding the Committee’s repeated calls, the applicant still has not been released;   Recalling that it is intolerable that, in a State

Respondent State urged to take individual measures

the applicant’s pre-trial detention on grounds pertaining to the same factual context would entail a prolongation of the violation of his rights as well as a breach of the obligation on the respondent State

Respondent State urged to take individual measures

compulsory military service cannot alleviate the need for the legislative amendments, as those measures do not offer an alternative to mandatory military service;   Reiterating the obligation of every State

Court would be highly desirable as a means to provide appropriate redress to the applicant, other forms of redress are also possible;   Reaffirming the unconditional obligation of every respondent State

would have enjoyed had the violations not occurred and that such measures should be compatible with the conclusions and spirit of the Court’s judgment, involving good faith on the part of the respondent State

applicants’ pre-trial detention on grounds pertaining to the same factual context would entail a prolongation of the violation of their rights as well as a breach of the obligation on the respondent State

of the Convention, to abide fully, effectively, and promptly by the final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights in any case to which they are a party:   REITERATED that the respondent state

Respondent State urged to take individual measures

the applicant’s pre-trial detention on grounds pertaining to the same factual context would entail a prolongation of the violation of his rights as well as a breach of the obligation on the respondent State

Respondent State urged to take individual measures

Respondent State urged to take individual measures

Respondent State urged to take individual measures

  The authorities would like to state that the Kavala judgment was translated into Turkish, published and circulated together with an explanatory note on the European Court’s findings to the relevant