CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 25 septembre 2014

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sDB9EB187 { font-weight:bold } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s62A2B7B8 { font-size:5.33pt; font-style:italic; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 } .s846B54EF { font-size:5.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 } .s3985515B { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s8AFB426F { width:32.67pt; display:inline-block } .sE3D66594 { border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .s41E9DBF5 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s5FFF0A7F { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:9pt } .s24AC208E { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sF004B676 { border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s546C9D04 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s40B7A780 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2EDFF { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s8567D65 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-36pt } .s94DD5772 { width:32.67pt; text-indent:0pt; display:inline-block } .sB30C44B0 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sC3AB69A { border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2342A031 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sF8F41F50 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; widows:0; orphans:0; font-size:9pt } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .s876D4AB2 { text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } Interim resolution CM/ResDH(2014)185 Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights in the cases Varnava, Xenides-Arestis and 32 other cases against Turkey (see the list of cases in the appendix)   (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 25 September 2014 at the 1208th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)     The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter “the Convention”) ;   Deeply deploring that to date, despite the interim resolutions adopted in the cases of Xenides-Arestis and Varnava [1] , the Turkish authorities have not complied with their obligation to pay the amounts awarded by the Court to the applicants in those cases, as well as in 32 other cases in the Xenides-Arestis group, on the grounds that this payment cannot be dissociated from the measures of substance in these cases;   Recalling in this respect that in two letters addressed to their Turkish counterpart [2] , the then Chairmen of the Committee of Ministers stressed on behalf of the Committee that the obligation to comply with the judgments of the Court is unconditional;   Found that the continued refusal to pay the sums awarded to the applicants amounts to a manifest breach of the obligation assumed by Turkey under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention to abide by the judgments of the Court;   DECLARES that this continued refusal by Turkey is in flagrant conflict with its international obligations, both as a High Contracting Party to the Convention and as a member State of the Council of Europe;   EXHORTS Turkey to review its position and to pay without any further delay the just satisfaction awarded to the applicants by the Court, as well as the default interest due.   Appendix List of cases   -   One case against Turkey concerning missing Greek Cypriots   Application Case Judgment of Final on 16064/90+ VARNAVA AND OTHERS 18/09/2009 Grand Chamber   -   33 cases against Turkey concerning interference in property rights and/or respect for home (properties in the northern part of Cyprus)   Application Case Judgment of Final on 46347/99 XENIDES-ARESTIS 22/12/2005 07/12/2006 22/03/2006 23/05/2007 16094/90 ANDREOU PAPI 22/09/2009 26/10/2010 01/03/2010 11/04/2011 18360/91 ANDREOU SOPHIA 27/01/2009 22/06/2010 06/07/2009 22/11/2010 16085/90 CHRISTODOULIDOU 22/09/2009 26/10/2010 01/03/2010 11/04/2011 16219/90 DEMADES 31/07/2003 22/04/2008 31/10/2003 01/12/2008 16259/90 DIOGENOUS AND TSERIOTIS 22/09/2009 26/10/2010 01/03/2010 11/04/2011 18405/91 ECONOMOU 27/01/2009 22/06/2010 06/07/2009 22/11/2010 19900/92 EPIPHANIOU AND OTHERS 22/09/2009 26/10/2010 01/03/2010 11/04/2011 18403/91 EVAGOROU CHRISTOU 27/01/2009 22/06/2010 06/07/2009 22/11/2010 41355/98 GAVRIEL 20/01/2009 22/06/2010 06/07/2009 22/11/2010 37395/97 HADJIPROCOPIOU AND OTHERS 22/09/2009 26/10/2010 01/03/2010 11/04/2011 39970/98 HADJITHOMAS AND OTHERS 22/09/2009 26/10/2010 01/03/2010 11/04/2011 35214/97 HAPESHIS AND HAPESHI-MICHAELIDOU 22/09/2009 26/10/2010 01/03/2010 11/04/2011 38179/97 HAPESHIS AND OTHERS 22/09/2009 26/10/2010 01/03/2010 11/04/2011 18364/91 IOANNOU 27/01/2009 22/06/2010 06/07/2009 22/11/2010 43685/98 IORDANIS IORDANOU 22/09/2009 26/10/2010 01/03/2010 11/04/2011 46755/99 IORDANOU ANTHOUSA 24/11/2009 11/01/2011 10/05/2010 20/06/2011 21887/93 JOSEPHIDES 22/09/2009 26/10/2010 01/03/2010 11/04/2011 18407/91 KYRIAKOU 27/01/2009 22/06/2010 06/07/2009 22/11/2010 16682/90 LOIZOU AND OTHERS 22/09/2009 26/10/2010 24/05/2011 01/03/2010 11/04/2011 28/11/2011 15973/90 LORDOS AND OTHERS 02/11/2010 10/01/2012 11/04/2011 09/07/2012 18361/91 MICHAEL 27/01/2009 22/06/2010 06/07/2009 22/11/2010 18406/91 NICOLAIDES 27/01/2009 22/06/2010 06/07/2009 22/11/2010 16091/90 OLYMBIOU 27/10/2009 26/10/2010 01/03/2010 11/04/2011 36705/97 ORPHANIDES 20/01/2009 22/06/2010 06/07/2009 22/11/2010 29092/95 RAMON 22/09/2009 26/10/2010 01/03/2010 11/04/2011 46159/99 ROCK RUBY HOTELS LTD 22/09/2009 26/10/2010 01/03/2010 11/04/2011 16160/90 SAVERIADES 22/09/2009 26/10/2010 01/03/2010 11/04/2011 47884/99 SKYROPIIA YIALIS LTD 22/09/2009 26/10/2010 01/03/2010 11/04/2011 16161/90 SOLOMONIDES 20/01/2009 27/07/2010 06/07/2009 22/11/2010 16082/90 STRATI 22/09/2009 26/10/2010 01/03/2010 11/04/2011 16078/90 VRAHIMI 22/09/2009 26/10/2010 01/03/2010 11/04/2011 16654/90 ZAVOU AND OTHERS 22/09/2009 26/10/2010 01/03/2010 11/04/2011       [1] Interim Resolutions CM/ResDH(2008)99 and CM/ResDH(2010)33 , adopted respectively in 2008 and 2010 in the case of Xenides-Arestis and Interim Resolution CM/ResDH(2013)201 , adopted in 2013 in the Varnava case. [2] Letters sent respectively in October 2009, in the case of Xenides-Arestis , and in April 2014, for all these cases.