Romania (dec.), no. 29958/96, 8   April 2003, and Azinas v.   Cyprus [GC], no. 56679/00, §§   37-43, 28 April 2004).

FRANCE IARD - RCS [Localité 17] n° 722 057 460 - [Adresse 6] Représentées par Me Asma MZE de la SELARL LX PARIS- VERSAILLES-REIMS, Postulant, avocat au barreau de VERSAILLES, vestiaire : 699 et Me Aziza

Thus, in Matthews and Aziz , the applicants (as a resident of Gibraltar and a member of the Turkish-Cypriot community living in the government-controlled area of Cyprus respectively) had no right to vote

  France [GC], n o 29183/95, § 38, CEDH 1999 ‑ I ; Azinas c. Chypre [GC], n o 56679/00, §§ 40-41, CEDH 2004 ‑ III ).

France [GC], n o   29183/95, § 37, CEDH 1999-I   ; Azinas c. Chypre [GC], n o   56679/00, § 38, CEDH 2004 ‑ III). 26.

  Roumanie (déc.), n o 29958/96, 8   avril 2003, Azinas c. Chypre [GC], n o   56679/00, § 32, CEDH 2004-III, et Sammut and Visa Investments Limited c.

level should have been aired before those same courts, at least in substance and in compliance with the formal requirements and time-limits laid down in domestic law (see, among other authorities, Azinas

international level should have been aired before the domestic authorities, at least in substance and in compliance with the formal requirements laid down in domestic law (see, amongst many others, Azinas

Therefore, she did not make proper use of an otherwise effective domestic remedy and had not provided the domestic courts with the opportunity to put right the alleged violation (compare Azinas v.

primarily the judicial authorities) to address allegations that a Convention right has been violated and, where appropriate, to afford redress before those allegations are submitted to the Court (see Azinas

exists at national level a remedy enabling the national courts to address, at least in substance, the argument of violation of the Convention right, it is that remedy which should be exhausted (see Azinas

relation to those Convention issues which have been aired before the domestic courts at least in substance and in compliance with the formal requirements and time-limits laid down in domestic law (see Azinas

Turkey (no. 74408/01) The applicants are ten Turkish nationals: Alibaba Arı, Ali Şen, Ferit Süer, Ali Kutlu, Muhittin Denktaş, Aziz Karasu, Fevzi Durusoy, Ahmet Aslan, Hasan Uçar and Mehmet Kuytu, born

Grèce , arrêt du 1 er juillet 1997, Recueil des arrêts et décisions 1997-IV, §   39, Aziz c. Chypre , arrêt du 22 juin 2004 n o   69949/01, § 25, et Hirst , précité, § 62). 33.

Turkey (no. 73016/01) The eight applicants, Kadriye Yıldız, Süheyla Yıldız, Nevzat Yıldız, Seyithan Yıldız, Arslan Yıldız, Gültekin Yıldız, Aziz Yıldız and Ferhan Yıldız, are Turkish nationals who were

Necmettin Yıldırım Abdurrahman Yıldırım Mehmet Reşit Yıldırım İsmail Yıldırım Abdurrezak Yıldırım Abdulhalim Yıldırım Raife Güngörmez Ramazan Güngörmez Fahri Güngörmez Ayşe Cingöz Mehmet Salih Cingöz Aziz

Türkiye 21/04/2021 Aziz ERZİNCANLI 1990 Erzincan   82. 25163/21 Kaya c. Türkiye 08/04/2021 Ahmet Vedat KAYA 1978 Elazığ Yusuf EKİNCİ 83. 28926/21 Aslantepe c.

[T] a été associé pendant 2 ans à Aziz (10 ans d'ancienneté) et a bénéficié de ses compétences.

du 12 Novembre 2024-Juge de l'exécution de CRETEIL- RG n° 24/06143 APPELANTES MADAME [L] [P] [Adresse 4] [Localité 1] - SUISSE MADAME [N] [D] [Adresse 8] [Localité 5] Représentées par Me Aziz