ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 4 OF THE CONVENTION 30.     The applicant complained of a violation of his rights set out in Article 5 § 4 of the Convention on two grounds.

The court dismissed the applicant’s argument of a violation of Article 5 of the Convention.

  THE LAW ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 OF THE CONVENTION 46.

THE LAW     ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 4 OF THE CONVENTION 13.

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 OF THE CONVENTION 11.

régulières;Article 5-1-c - Raisons plausibles de soupçonner;Article 5-3 - Caractère raisonnable de la détention provisoire);Violation de l'article 5 - Droit à la liberté et à la sûreté (Article 5-1 -

Ukraine - 58444/15 Arrêt 17.9.2020 [Section V] Article 5 Article 5-3 Caractère raisonnable de la détention provisoire Absence d’incidence sur le caractère justifié du placement en détention provisoire

THE LAW ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 4 of the Convention 6.

  ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION 24.     The applicant complained that his detention pending extradition had been unlawful.

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 OF THE CONVENTION 55.

She referred to Article 5 § 1 (c), cited above, and Article 5 § 3 of the Convention in this connection. Article 5 § 3 of the Convention reads as follows: “3.

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 3 OF THE CONVENTION 14.

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 4 OF THE CONVENTION 18.

    On 5 September 2014 the District Court changed the measure of restraint from detention to house arrest. THE LAW I.     ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 4 OF THE CONVENTION 8.

  52158/13 also raised a complaint under Article 5 § 4 of the Convention. THE LAW JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS 6.

THE LAW ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 4 of the Convention 8.     The applicant complained of the excessive length of judicial review of detention before the ordinary courts.

They relied on Article   5   §   3 of the Convention, which read as follows: Article   5   §   3 “3.

THE LAW ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 4 of the Convention 8.     The applicant complained of the excessive length of judicial review of detention before the ordinary courts.

  73341/14, the applicant also raised other complaints under Article 5 § 4 of the Convention. THE LAW JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS 5.