They entered France legally in 2007, the first applicant under a “salaried employee” visa, then his wife and their older child under a “visitor” visa.

against Ukraine lodged on 2 March 2021 communicated on 9 September 2021 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns a dispute under the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child

CE QU'IL RESULTE DES MENTIONS DE L'ARRET ATTAQUE QUE LA COUR A ENTENDU, A LA DEMANDE DE LA DEFENSE, ET A TITRE DE RENSEIGNEMENTS, LE SURVEILLANT CHEF DE LA MAISON D'ARRET DE BORDEAUX ET LE CONSUL DU CHILI

A B, représenté par Me Chelly, demande au tribunal d'annuler l'arrêté n° 23/84/735Q du 10 novembre 2023 par lequel la préfète de Vaucluse l'oblige à quitter le territoire français sans délai de départ

A B, représenté par Me Chelly, demande au tribunal l'annulation de l'arrêté n° 23/84/741G du 13 novembre 2023, par lequel la préfète de Vaucluse l'oblige à quitter le territoire français sans délai de

B A, représenté par Me Chelly, demande au tribunal d'annuler l'arrêté n° 23/84/755Q du 17 novembre 2023 par lequel la préfète de Vaucluse l'oblige à quitter le territoire français sans délai de départ

lodged on 20 March 2018 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the alleged violation of the applicant’s right to family life as a result of his inability to have sufficient access to his child

private and family life) and Article 14 of the Convention taken in conjunction with Article 8 about the domestic authorities’ refusal to register the second applicant, who in the meantime adopted the child

Since then, the child has been living with his mother in the Czech Republic.   When his wife left him, the applicant brought proceedings to gain parental responsibility for the child.

The child stayed with his mother, whereas the applicant had the right to see him in accordance with a court-approved schedule.

on the purchase of suitably adapted property: violation Facts – The applicant lived with and provided care for his severely disabled child.

In the summer of 2019 the Child Protection Services (CPS) intervened following repeated reports about alleged neglect of the child and about the mother’s mental health issues.

By order of 22   February 2016 he ordered the applicant’s placement with the child welfare department in order to provide him with accommodation and enable him to be reunited with members of his family

There was no evidence that the specialists of the Nizhniy Novgorod childcare authorities, on whose opinion the courts had relied, had ever met the child and assessed his attitude to each parent.

A B, représenté par Me Chelly, demande au tribunal : 1°) d'annuler l'arrêté 2025-BSE-118 du 25 mars 2025 par lequel le préfet du Gard n'a pas fait droit à sa demande de titre de séjour et l'a obligé

Vu la procédure suivante : Par une requête, enregistrée le 14 février 2024, Mme A B, représentée par Me Chelly, demande au tribunal : 1°) de lui accorder le bénéfice de l'aide juridictionnelle provisoire

It further vested custody rights over their minor child with the applicant and obliged her husband to pay maintenance for the child.

  The return order to Israel was not enforced and the child resides with his mother in Switzerland.