The six-month rule 25.

On 27 November 2007 the Court indicated an interim measure under Rule 39 of the Rules of Court, inviting the Government to secure immediately the applicant's in-patient treatment in a hospital specialised

39 of the Rules of Court).

The applicants requested interim measures under Rule 39 of the Rules of the Court, which were granted.

par l'UNION LOCALE CGT DE CAEN ET DE L'AGGLOMERATION, ..., en cassation d'un jugement rendu le 12 avril 1988 par le tribunal d'instance de Caen, au profit : 1°/ de la société anonyme ENTREPRISE RUFA

    Has there been a breach of Article 34 of the Convention on account of the delay in the authorities’ compliance with Rule 39 of the Rules of Court, under which the Court indicated to the Government

Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Admissibility of the response to an appeal submitted by a party against which an order was made by default at first instance – Article 172 of the Rules

Traja (Rule 24 § 3 and Rule 100 §   4). Subsequently, Mr Ress, who had taken part in the Commission’s examination of the case withdrew from sitting in the Grand Chamber (Rule   28).

: those Rules were prepared in accordance with the European Prison Rules. 24.

43, paragraph 3, of the Rules of the Court (old Rule 44, paragraph 2) provides that the striking-out of a case shall be effected by means of a judgment which the President shall forward to the Committee

7,5% would be payable on those sums from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement; - dismissed the remainder of the applicant’s claim for just satisfaction; Having regard to the Rules

judges, and Stanley Naismith, Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 19 October 2007, Having regard to the interim measure indicated to the respondent Government under Rule

On 4 June 2007 the Court decided to give urgent notification of the application to the Government (Rule 40 of the Rules of Court).

On 5 May 2017 the Centre for Democracy and Rule of Law (CEDEM) based in Kyiv was granted leave by the President to intervene as a third party (Article 36   §   2 of the Convention and Rule &#

The President granted the applicant’s request for her identity not to be disclosed to the public (Rule 47 § 4). She was represented before the Court by Ms A.

, and Stanley Naismith, Deputy Section Registrar , Having regard to the above application lodged on 9 December 2005, Having regard to the interim measure indicated to the respondent Government under Rule

47 § 4 of the Rules of Court, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The applicant’s details are set out in the appendix.

payable on those sums from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement;   - dismissed the remainder of the applicant’s claim for just satisfaction;   Having regard to the Rules

On 12 December 2013 the applicants lodged a request for application of an interim measure under Rule 39 of the Rules of Court in relation to their participation in mass protests in Kyiv at the time.