QUI ETAIT ATTEINT DE RHUMATISMES DEFORMANTS LUI INTERDISANT PHYSIQUEMENT L'EXECUTION DE TELLES Z... ; QU'AUGUSTE B... PUIS SES HERITIERS ONT BENEFICIE DES DROITS D'EDITION AFFERENTS A CES Z...

On 16   August   2021, in a public space in Skopje, the applicants were allegedly stopped by police officers, who reportedly used racial slurs referring to their Roma origin.

Auguste C..., demeurant ..., 10 / de M. Jean-Luc A..., demeurant ..., 11 / de M.

B A demande au tribunal : 1°) de le décharger de la cotisation de taxe d'habitation à laquelle il a été assujetti au titre de l'année 2019 à raison de son bien sis 103 avenue Philippe Auguste à Paris

There was no need to determine whether the certificate relied on in the final decision of 27   August 2003 was the same as that which had been contemplated in the proceedings against the mayor as,

Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as "the Convention"),        Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the F.C.B. case delivered on 28 August

Having become final on 9 August 2017, the judgment was fully enforced on 29 September 2017 based on the enforcement order from 18 September 2017.

On 8 August 2004, due to the expiry of the applicant’s immunity, the criminal proceedings were resumed.

In August 1984 she was discharged from care and in July 1985 she was transferred to a hostel for the homeless.

The Regional Court essentially upheld the decision of 16 August 2005 on 6 September 2005.

On 19 August 2011 the Committee suggested changing the place and time of the meeting.

On 27 August 2019 the Court received a letter from Ms Yaremchuk enclosing a new power of attorney signed in the applicant’s name on 19   August 2019, whereby Ms Yaremchuk was again appointed to represent

    On 19 August 2009 the applicant lodged a motion for deadline. The proceedings are still pending before the Supreme Court. 2.     Second set of proceedings (no. P239/95) 8.

  On 14 August 1996 the District Court partly dismissed the applicant’s claim. Following her appeal, the St.

  1 about non-enforcement of the judgment of 30   August 2004.

Romania ) On 27 August 2021 the applicant’s mother lodged an action by means of an interim procedure, seeking to obtain a decision by the Bucharest District Court replacing the father’s consent to re &

By a letter of 22 August 2006 the Government’s observations were sent by registered mail to the applicant.

On 26 August 2013 the Shirvan Court of Appeal upheld the first-instance court’s decision.

font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } Communicated on 27 January 2021 Published on 15 February 2021   FIRST SECTION Application no. 47731/19 Mirosław CZESZEL against Poland lodged on 19 August