Serbia (dec.), no.   18369/07, 4   March 2008). In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list.

aside the application of the six months’ rule solely because a Government have not made a preliminary objection based on it, as in the present case (see, for example, Walker v. the United Kingdom , (dec

Poland no. 33502/09 (dec.), 12   October 2010, §§ 71-85 and §§ 62-76 respectively).

France [GC], (dec.), no. 76642/01, § 37, ECHR 2006 ‑ ... and the cases cited therein). 25.

Poland (dec.), no. 24549/03, §§ 37-43).

Poland (dec.), no. 24549/03, §§ 37-43).

Neither the Bankruptcy Act nor the Postal Service Decree (which was not even in force at the relevant time) provided for any such restrictions.

The Chairman and the Vice-Chairmen must have a law degree and possess experience as judges (section 2, as amended by Decree no. 1121/1995).

led to conviction of bank-card fraudster: no violation Facts – Following a complaint lodged by the director of a bank and the instigation of criminal proceedings by the public prosecutor, Mr   Nicolas

JUGEMENT CONTENTIEUX DU 09 JANVIER 2024 Chambre 7/Section 3 AFFAIRE: N° RG 22/08509 - N° Portalis DB3S-W-B7G-WWMD N° de MINUTE : 24/00004 Madame [D] [X] [Adresse 1] [Localité 3] représentée par Me Nicolas

exécutés dans un lieu clos dans la mesure où ils sont effectués dans un immeuble bâti ; que la présence de vitraux ou de verrièresaménagées dans le sol des combles de l'église pour l'éclairage ou la décoration

LES CHENES [Adresse 4] [Localité 12] représentée par Maître Nicolas PCHIBICH de la SELARL RETAIL PLACES, avocat au barreau de PARIS, vestiaire #D0266 Décision du 02 Octobre 2025 18° chambre 2ème

RIGAULT, avoués assistée de la SCP DECKER & ASSOCIES, avocats DEFENDERESSE D'autre part, a rendu l'arrêt contradictoire suivant après que la cause ait été débattue et plaidée en audience publique et solennelle

ADMISSIBILITY OF Application no. 31413/03 by Lilian OSOIAN against Moldova The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 28   February 2006 as a Chamber composed of:   Sir   Nicolas

  Serbia (dec.), no.   18369/07, 4   March 2008). In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list.

  Romania (dec.), no.   122/17, 15   November 2022, and invited the Court to declare the cases inadmissible. The Court recalls that in Polgar v.   Romania , no.

Having regard to the observations submitted by the respondent Government and the observations in reply submitted by the applicant, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS The applicant, Mr Nikola

.sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .sA4BC3E2E { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }   THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 18175/12 Nikolla

Having regard to the observations submitted by the respondent Government and the observations in reply submitted by the applicant, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS The applicant, Mr Nikola