CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

1 305 résultats pour « Buffin »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0531JUD003094996

Admin. suprême

31 mai 2005

31 mai 2005

    In 1995 the applicant's son, Kadri Ateş, lived in Diyarbakır where he worked for Zahit Trade, a business which sold foodstuffs wholesale to small businesses and security and military establishments

Page 65 sur 66

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0202JUD003323896

Admin. suprême

2 février 2006

2 février 2006

#xa0; The witness, who is a resident of Gözeler, stated that since early October 1994, the TKP/TIKKO and the PKK had forced the Ovacık inhabitants to provide food and supplies, to shut down their businesses

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0222JUD006244410

Admin. suprême

22 février 2024

22 février 2024

would be affected by the enforcement of the decisions and the occupants would not be able to use the water supply or sewage infrastructure necessary for the normal functioning of their households and businesses

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0322JUD001347218

Admin. suprême

22 mars 2022

22 mars 2022

    The applicant owned two businesses in Moldova and was a member of the local council in the town of Codru, representing P.N., an opposition political party. 6.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-243752

Admin. suprême

7 mai 2025

7 mai 2025

online application submitted through the DIIA website (DIIA stands for “ Держава і я ” – “The State and Me”; it is a digital platform that provides a wide range of state services for citizens and businesses

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1210DEC000128421

Admin. suprême

10 décembre 2024

10 décembre 2024

The measures had been tailored in such a manner that they had eliminated all likelihood that the first and second applicants might restore their businesses, and had never achieved their “official” aim,

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1005JUD002271612

Admin. suprême

5 octobre 2023

5 octobre 2023

The Supreme Administrative Court was initially consistent in granting the excise-tax exemption to businesses selling cigarettes as described in section 37(7) of the 1993 Excise Tax Act (see   judgments

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1220JUD005328218

Admin. suprême

20 décembre 2022

20 décembre 2022

shall have the following meanings: (a)     ’Occupational social security schemes’ – schemes whose purpose is to provide workers, whether employed or self-employed, in a business or group of businesses

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0510JUD002532903

Admin. suprême

10 mai 2012

10 mai 2012

    In October 2002 the second applicant published an article in the national newspaper România   liberă about the various businesses run by I.T. 34.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0923DEC001639518

Admin. suprême

23 septembre 2025

23 septembre 2025

The audit referred to them as “missing traders” (or “poppers” [ ploffers ], as a colloquial expression for “businesses that go ‘pop’”). 12.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1202DEC000919523

Admin. suprême

2 décembre 2025

2 décembre 2025

of L.R. provided by the first applicant (see paragraph 4 above), visited the location of the incident and took photographs, and spoke to the residents of nearby buildings and employees of nearby businesses

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0120DEC005567222

Admin. suprême

20 janvier 2026

20 janvier 2026

Government argued that such a claim could be lodged in situations where “the administration acts or fails to act in breach of the law, thereby infringing the rights or interests of individuals or businesses

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-243751

Admin. suprême

7 mai 2025

7 mai 2025

application about destroyed property via the DIIA website (DIIA stands for “Держава і я” – “The State and Me”; it is a digital platform that provides a wide range of state services for citizens and businesses

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1013JUD001132714

Admin. suprême

13 octobre 2015

13 octobre 2015

operations from the standpoint of Article 2 of the Convention, it must have particular regard to the context in which the incident occurred, as well as to the way in which the situation developed (see Bubbins

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1115DEC003628897

Admin. suprême

15 novembre 2005

15 novembre 2005

  The applicants finally complained under Article 14 of the Convention that they were discriminated against because they had succeeded in their businesses. THE LAW A.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0323DEC001909020

Admin. suprême

23 mars 2021

23 mars 2021

However, this had led to the limitation of the freedoms of all person in Malta, including businesses and workplaces, as well as restricting visits to institutions and hospitals.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1119DEC003927307

Admin. suprême

19 novembre 2019

19 novembre 2019

They mainly concerned discussions about local politicians and businesses and their advertising in the newspapers. Criminal proceedings against the first applicant 31 .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1122JUD002260302

Admin. suprême

22 novembre 2007

22 novembre 2007

an infrastructure for the cooperation between the Ukrainian and Tyumen companies and to implement the intergovernmental decisions aiming at improving effectiveness of the cooperation between the businesses

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0120JUD003422196

Admin. suprême

20 janvier 2004

20 janvier 2004

The charges related to a period between 30   January and 3   March 1995 when the applicant, together with his accomplices, allegedly defrauded several individuals and businesses by obtaining

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0207JUD002013405

Admin. suprême

7 février 2012

7 février 2012

The first phase of the development extended from 1992 to 1994 during which time the economic and commercial activity of the company was concentrated in the sphere of fast-income businesses, relying on

Source officielle