Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-204295
9 juillet 2020
9 juillet 2020
the material conditions of the applicant’s detention, in particular the manner of access to sanitary facilities and the manner of use of physical restraints, amount to inhuman or degrading treatment contrary
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-242632
5 mars 2025
5 mars 2025
The applicants allege that receiving medical care while handcuffed constituted treatment contrary to Article 3 of the Convention.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-172850
17 mars 2017
17 mars 2017
QUESTIONS tO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicants’ right to respect for family life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention (see, notably, Neulinger and Shuruk v.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-196974
23 septembre 2019
23 septembre 2019
QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his private life contrary to Article 8 of the Convention?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-244133
12 juin 2025
12 juin 2025
QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES Did the decision to terminate the applicant’s parental authority over her three children constitute a violation of her right to respect for her family life, contrary to Article
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-215084
16 décembre 2021
16 décembre 2021
QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for her family life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-177326
28 août 2017
28 août 2017
QUESTION Did the applicants suffer discrimination in the enjoyment of their rights guaranteed by the domestic law on local elections, contrary to Article 1 of Protocol No. 12 to the
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-246113
20 octobre 2025
20 octobre 2025
QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to freedom of expression, contrary to Article 10 of the Convention, on account of her obligation to pay compensation with
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-228912
18 octobre 2023
18 octobre 2023
Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his private life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention (cf. Budimir v.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-242815
19 mars 2025
19 mars 2025
However, contrary to the indications given in these letters, the Social Security Institution rejected the applicant’s retirement pension request on the grounds that he had not attained 25 years of service
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-231295
1 février 2024
1 février 2024
QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicants’ right to freedom of expression, specifically their right to impart information and ideas, contrary to Article 10 of the Convention
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-233139
18 mars 2024
18 mars 2024
QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his private life, specifically to his right to honour and reputation, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-225806
13 juin 2023
13 juin 2023
Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his private life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention? 2.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-229627
20 novembre 2023
20 novembre 2023
Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for her private life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention, on account of her involuntary placement and treatment in a psychiatric
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-229704
27 novembre 2023
27 novembre 2023
QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to freedom of peaceful assembly, contrary to Article 11 of the Convention?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-222957
10 janvier 2023
10 janvier 2023
If it could not, was that impossibility contrary to (a) the applicant company’s right of access to a court guaranteed by Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see Project-Trade d.o.o. v.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-222958
10 janvier 2023
10 janvier 2023
It noted that Danish courts can make a finding that the Logging Order is invalid/inapplicable in respect of specific legal matters, to the extent that application of the Order would be contrary to EU law
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-215839
27 janvier 2022
27 janvier 2022
Were the applicants deprived of their liberty merely on the ground of their inability to fulfil a contractual obligation, contrary to Article 1 of Protocol No. 4?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-215999
1 février 2022
1 février 2022
QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to freedom of expression, contrary to Article 10 of the Convention (see Braun v. Poland , no.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-245717
1 octobre 2025
1 octobre 2025
QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to property contrary to Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention by the partial demolition of his building and the
Source officiellePage 63 sur 1005