CEDHCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 27 janvier 2022
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-215839
- Date
- 27 janvier 2022
- Publication
- 27 janvier 2022
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleCommunicated
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s5FFF0A75 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:7pt } .s25D5DE94 { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:7pt } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s2D726B78 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s75A32C27 { border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s2EB42ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top }   Published on 14 February 2022   FIFTH SECTION Application no. 77770/17 Ramil Bashir oglu NASIBOV against Azerbaijan and 3 other applications (see list appended) communicated on 27 January 2022 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASES The present four applications concern the domestic courts’ decisions sentencing the applicants to various periods of administrative detention under Article 528 of the Code of Administrative Offences for non-enforcement of a court judgment.     QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.     Did the applicants have a fair hearing in the determination of the criminal charges against them, in accordance with Article   6 §   1 of the Convention? In particular, did the domestic courts establish the existence of all the elements of the offence of which the applicants were convicted and provide reasons for their decisions (see Karimov and Others v. Azerbaijan , nos. 24219/16 and 2 others, 22 July 2021)?   2.     Were the applicants deprived of their liberty merely on the ground of their inability to fulfil a contractual obligation, contrary to Article   1 of Protocol No.   4?     APPENDIX List of applications. No. Application no. Case name Lodged on Applicant Year of Birth Place of Residence Represented by 1. 77770/17 Nasibov v. Azerbaijan 27/10/2017 Ramil Bashir oglu NASIBOV 1976 Sumgayit Nurlana ALIYEVA 2. 79191/17 Amirov v. Azerbaijan 07/11/2017 Ruslan Tahmaz oglu AMIROV 1982 Masalli Javad JAVADOV 3. 81103/17 Mahmudov v. Azerbaijan 17/11/2017 Gadir Mahmud oglu MAHMUDOV 1957 Baku Akram HASANOV 4. 6655/19 Agayev v. Azerbaijan 28/01/2019 Sakin Abdulhuseyn oglu AGAYEV 1963 Baku Mukhtar MUSTAFAYEV      Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
- Date
- 27 janvier 2022
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-215839
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel