The applicant appealed, having stated, inter alia , that he had not been able to participate in the hearing because of his poor state of health.

  Article 1 of Protocol No. 4 was inapplicable to the system of imprisonment in default because it prohibited imprisonment for unpaid debts solely in the case of a “contractual obligation”.

the Grand Chamber on 17 November 2014] Facts – The applicant, a Libyan national who had been living in Sweden since 2010, applied for asylum there initially on the grounds that he feared persecution because

been prepared to accept that the interference had been aimed at protecting the constitutional order and ensuring compliance with electoral legislation, it was not necessary to decide this question, because

that she had also used the telephone and that the second applicant could not obtain examination of his arguments related to the deficiencies of the relevant order in the criminal proceedings, first, because

challenge in Supreme Administrative Court implied refusal of Minister of Education and Religious Affairs to grant authorisation sought: doubt as to starting-point of period for bringing such an appeal because

Law – Article 8: Article 8 was applicable because the allegations in the newspaper article were serious enough to impugn the personal integrity of the persons concerned.

2021 the Amsterdam Regional Court acquitted the applicant of these charges, considering that the incriminating statements the accused had made to the undercover agent had to be excluded from evidence because

Decision 14.6.2001 [Section IV] Article 5 Article 5-4 Review of lawfulness of detention Review of lawfulness of continuation of psychiatric detention of a person considered not to be criminally liable because

Tyrer, resident in the Isle of Man, alleging a violation of the convention because of a judicial corporal punishment inflicted upon him on the basis of legislation in force in the Isle of Man, a dependency

The preliminary hearing, scheduled for 22 March 1995, was adjourned on three occasions because the lawyers of the Benevento Bar Association were on strike and eventually took place on 4 July 1995.

He underlines, in this respect, that the Court of Appeal dismissed his action because there was no prior response of the administrative authority, which was not imputable to him.

She argued that because of the four-year term of office for the Secretary General, she would have to leave the service on 14 November 2021, at the age of sixty-one, instead of retiring on 3 June 2027 at

He submits that because of his illnesses and the restricted possibilities to purchase certain food products in prison, he needed protein supplements, therefore, they were of essential importance for his

The applicants further claimed that because their property had been de facto expropriated, they should have, at the very least, received compensation The Constitutional Court did not consider the merits

Consequently, it had not refused the applicant leave to appeal because it had disagreed with the finding that she had been a victim of trafficking, but rather because it had found that at the time of the

Vu la procédure suivante : Par une requête et un mémoire, enregistrés les 2 février 2023 et 9 février 2024, qui n'a pas été communiqué, Mme B A, représentée par Me Béchaux, demande au tribunal : 1°

Inadmissible under Article 14   – The applicants considered that they had been discriminated against either because of the content of the regional laws or because of how they were applied in practice